Single Booster Binder Mechanism Slide Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current binder mechanisms are difficult to operate, have a short lifespan, are costly to manufacture, and lack control over ring opening, making them noisy and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A binder mechanism featuring a base with pivotally coupled ring bases, a slide, and an actuator with a wedge slider portion that allows for controlled opening and closing of the rings, reducing noise and manufacturing complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional binder mechanisms with multiple small components are used, then the rings can be opened and closed, but the device becomes complex to manufacture and expensive to produce

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple traditional binder mechanism components into a single integrated slide component. The slide incorporates the actuator, the opening/closing mechanism, and the control features all in one piece, eliminating the need for multiple separate small components that were difficult to assemble and expensive to manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The slide component performs multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as the actuator to move the rings, serves as the control mechanism to regulate opening distance, and functions as the structural element connecting to the ring bases. This multi-functionality reduces the overall component count and simplifies manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If traditional binder mechanisms are used, then the rings can be opened completely, but the operation becomes noisy and lacks control over opening distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol over ring openingVSAvoidnoise during operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The slide incorporates visual indicators (such as windows or markers) that provide feedback to the user about the ring opening distance. This allows the user to control the opening distance precisely rather than having the rings snap to extreme positions, reducing noise and improving operability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism transitions from a binary open/closed state to a continuous range of opening positions. The slide can be positioned at various distances from the ring bases, allowing dynamic control over the ring opening distance rather than forcing complete opening or closing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If traditional binder mechanisms with many small components are used, then the rings can be actuated, but the assembly process becomes time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidnumber of components to assemble
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple components into the single slide component, the assembly process is dramatically simplified. Instead of assembling numerous small parts, the slide can be installed as one piece, significantly reducing assembly time and increasing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The binder mechanism is segmented into major assemblies (housing, slide, ring bases) rather than numerous small components. This segmentation into larger, fewer modules makes the assembly process more efficient and less prone to errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If traditional binder mechanisms are used, then the rings can be opened and closed, but the mechanism has a short operational lifespan

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational lifespanVSAvoidnumber of moving parts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The slide is designed as a single robust component with no internal moving parts that wear. By combining multiple functions into this wear-free component, the overall mechanism reliability is improved as there are fewer parts that can fail or wear out over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mechanism is easier to operate, has a longer lifespan, is cheaper and quicker to manufacture, and allows for precise control over ring opening, enhancing usability and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The actuator may include a wedge slider portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWedge mechanism: Wedge

Data Source

PatentUS9731542B2Single booster binder mechanism
Publication Date: 2017.08.15 CCL LABEL INC
  • US9731542B2 patent drawing
  • US9731542B2 patent drawing
  • US9731542B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A binder mechanism is shown and described herein. The binder mechanism may include a base, first and second ring bases pivotally coupled to the base, first and second ring portions fixed with the ring bases, at least one pin attached with the first and second ring bases, a slide operatively engaged with the base and operatively engaged with the at least one pin, the slide selectively and axially positionable relative to the base, and an actuator operatively engaged with the slide, where the actuator is configured to selectively and axially position the slide whereby the slide positions the at least one pin to pivot the first and second ring bases away from one another to disengage the first and second ring portions.