Single-Cavity Oven Design for Sequential Proofing and Baking Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Bread is difficult to cook quickly and uniformly due to the complexities of retarding, proofing, and baking processes, which require precise control of temperature, humidity, and air circulation.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for baking bread that involves controlling temperature and humidity in a baking compartment using blowers and heating elements to proof and bake the dough, with a secondary blower for active gas exhaustion to manage humidity and a steam injection system for crust enhancement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate proofing and baking cavities are used, then the bread can be proofed and baked sequentially, but the device complexity increases and the process time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebread qualityVSAvoidoven structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies multi-functionality by enabling a single baking cavity to perform both proofing and baking operations. The cavity is equipped with controllable heating elements, humidification systems, and air circulation mechanisms that allow it to create optimal conditions for both proofing (warm, humid environment) and baking (hot, dry environment), eliminating the need for separate cavities while maintaining bread quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses dynamic control of environmental parameters within the single cavity. The system dynamically adjusts temperature, humidity, and air circulation based on the current operation phase (proofing or baking). During proofing, the cavity maintains warm temperatures with high humidity; during baking, it rapidly increases temperature and reduces humidity, allowing one cavity to adapt to different functional requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If separate proofing and baking cavities are used, then each cavity can be optimized for its specific function, but the total process time increases due to sequential operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproofing and baking qualityVSAvoidtotal process time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing the proofing operation before baking within the same cavity. The dough is first proofed in the cavity under controlled warm and humid conditions, then the cavity environment is rapidly changed and the same cavity is used for baking. This sequential operation within a single cavity eliminates the time required to transfer dough between separate cavities while maintaining optimal conditions for each stage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The single cavity is designed with universal functionality to handle both proofing and baking operations. It includes heating elements for temperature control, humidification systems for moisture management, and air circulation mechanisms for uniform heat distribution. This multi-functional design allows the cavity to be reused immediately after proofing for baking, eliminating idle time and cavity transfer time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If a single cavity is used for both proofing and baking, then the process time is reduced, but the manufacturing precision of temperature and humidity control becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess timeVSAvoidtemperature and humidity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control systems with sensors that continuously monitor temperature and humidity within the cavity. During proofing, sensors detect environmental conditions and provide feedback to controllers that adjust heating and humidification rates. During baking, similar feedback mechanisms rapidly adjust temperature and humidity levels. This closed-loop control ensures precise environmental management despite the cavity's dual functionality and the rapid transitions between operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic control mechanisms that rapidly adjust environmental parameters based on real-time operational requirements. When transitioning from proofing to baking, the system dynamically changes heating power, humidification rates, and air circulation speeds. This dynamic responsiveness allows the single cavity to maintain precise temperature and humidity control throughout different operation phases and transitions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If active gas exhaustion is used to reduce humidity, then the humidity control precision is improved, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehumidity controlVSAvoidblower energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by using the blower in intermittent rather than continuous operation. During proofing, the blower operates periodically to remove excess humidity when needed, then stops to conserve energy. During the transition to baking, the blower is activated more frequently to rapidly reduce humidity before baking begins. This periodic operation achieves necessary humidity control while minimizing energy consumption compared to continuous blower operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for precise control of the baking process, ensuring uniform rise and baking of bread, improving crust texture and color, and enabling efficient transition between proofing and baking stages.

Implementation Method 1

operating a first blower to move gas into the baking compartment and operating at least one heating element to heat the gas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

operating a second blower different than the first blower to move gas from the baking compartment out a vent of the oven to ambient

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced Convection: Forced Convection

Data Source

PatentUS11602149B2Food preparation apparatus and methods
Publication Date: 2023.03.14 DUKE MANUFACTURING CO
  • US11602149B2 patent drawing
  • US11602149B2 patent drawing
  • US11602149B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Food preparation apparatus and associated methods. In one method, dough is proofed in an oven compartment and then baked in the same oven compartment. Temperature and/or humidity can be controlled during proofing and/or baking cycles. A blower may be used, for example, to exhaust gas to ambient to reduce heat and/or moisture in the compartment. For example, the blower may be used between proofing and baking cycles to prepare an environment in the oven compartment for the baking cycle.