Single-Cell DNA Analysis for Forensic Mixture Interpretation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Forensic DNA mixture interpretation in the presence of multiple contributors is prone to inconsistent results due to high levels of allele non-detection and artifacts like stutter, especially in single-cell samples, where traditional methods fail to accurately determine the number of contributors and weight of evidence.

Innovation Solution

The development of a method for single-cell DNA analysis that involves isolating individual cells, extracting nucleic acids, amplifying biomolecular markers, and using quantitative data from signal profiles to cluster cells and determine the number of contributors, employing techniques like capillary electrophoresis and next-generation sequencing to generate accurate DNA profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional forensic DNA methods are used to analyze mixtures, then the analysis can be performed with standard procedures, but the results are inconsistent and unreliable due to allele non-detection and stutter artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of DNA mixture interpretationVSAvoidaccuracy in determining number of contributors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the mixture analysis into two distinct approaches: (1) analyzing multiple single-cell profiles individually to determine contributor numbers, and (2) using quantitative peak height data from each cell to weight the evidence. This segmentation allows the method to avoid the artifacts that plague bulk mixture analysis while preserving the benefits of quantitative measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces single-cell DNA profiles as an intermediary between bulk mixture analysis and individual contributor analysis. By analyzing DNA from multiple single cells and clustering them, the method uses these single-cell profiles as mediators to accurately determine the number of contributors and weight the evidence, bypassing the direct analysis of complex bulk mixtures that produces inconsistent results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If quantitative peak height data is not used and only qualitative peak presence is analyzed, then the analysis is simpler, but the weight of evidence cannot be accurately determined

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of analysis methodVSAvoidloss of quantitative evidence information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis by generating single-cell DNA profiles and clustering them to determine the number of contributors before using the quantitative peak height data from those same profiles to weight the evidence. This preliminary clustering action organizes the data structure so that quantitative information can be effectively utilized without adding excessive complexity to the overall analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If single-cell analysis is performed to avoid mixture artifacts, then allele dropout and stutter are reduced, but the number of cells required for analysis increases the complexity of the procedure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of allele detectionVSAvoidcomplexity of single-cell isolation and analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple single-cell analysis steps into an integrated workflow: single-cell isolation, DNA extraction, amplification, profiling, and automated clustering are combined into a unified process. This merging reduces the operational complexity that would arise from treating each step as a separate, manual procedure while maintaining the precision benefits of single-cell analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automated clustering algorithms that self-organize the single-cell profiles without requiring manual intervention to determine the number of contributors. The algorithm automatically processes the electropherogram data, clusters cells by genetic similarity, and identifies contributor numbers, allowing the system to serve itself and reducing the complexity burden on the analyst.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise determination of the number of contributors in forensic samples, improving the accuracy of DNA mixture interpretation and weight of evidence by addressing issues of allele dropout and stutter, leading to more reliable forensic analysis.

Implementation Method 1

employing techniques like capillary electrophoresis and next-generation sequencing to generate accurate DNA profiles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary electrophoresis: Capillary Electrophoresis

Data Source

PatentUS20220270712A1Systems and methods for automated analyses of a biological sample
Publication Date: 2022.08.25 RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV
  • US20220270712A1 patent drawing
  • US20220270712A1 patent drawing
  • US20220270712A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of the present disclosure enable automated analyses of a biological sample using a processing system by receiving signal profiles of each allele of a set of cells in the sample. A set of allele vectors are determined based on a mapping of the magnitude of the measurement of each signal profile at each locus to an index location. A set of cell vectors is generated by concatenating each allele vector of each cell. A cluster model is utilized to generate clusters of the signal profiles based on the set of cell vectors to represent contributors. A first likelihood of a target contributor matching a contributor and a second likelihood of the target contributor not matching any contributor are determined by comparing the target signal profile to each cluster. A likelihood ratio is determined from a ratio of the first likelihood and the second likelihood.