Single-Chamber Casting with Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for casting single crystal metal parts are inflexible due to the need for an inert atmosphere, struggle to optimize cooling gradients, are economically inefficient due to high equipment and material costs, and are not compatible with additive manufacturing methods.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that allows exposure to air, uses a single chamber for melting and molding, and includes a furnace with a pressure control system to manage pressure and gas composition, enabling the casting of single crystal parts with improved cooling and compatibility with additive manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional methods use an inert atmosphere for casting single crystal parts, then the crystallization process is protected from oxidation, but the process flexibility is reduced and equipment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystallization protectionVSAvoidprocess flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inert atmosphere by introducing a protective gas environment during the casting process. The system uses gas flow control to create and maintain an inert atmosphere within the casting chamber, protecting the molten metal from oxidation while allowing for process flexibility through controlled gas introduction and removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

2Device complexity

If conventional methods use a single chamber for both melting and molding, then equipment complexity is reduced, but it is difficult to optimize cooling gradients for single piece parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment structureVSAvoidcooling gradient optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the thermal control system by introducing separate heating and cooling zones within the single chamber. The mold is positioned to receive directed cooling from specific directions while the ingot remains in the heating zone. This spatial segmentation allows independent optimization of heating and cooling gradients despite using a single chamber structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing non-uniform cooling to different regions of the mold. Cooling is applied locally to specific areas of the mold cavity to create optimized cooling gradients in critical regions, while other areas receive different cooling intensities. This allows precise control of solidification patterns in specific zones without requiring multiple chambers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If conventional methods produce many components per batch, then economic feasibility is improved, but equipment costs and material commitments increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponents per batchVSAvoidmaterial commitment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-heating the mold before introducing the molten metal. The mold is heated to the appropriate temperature in advance, then positioned in the casting chamber where it receives molten metal. This allows for efficient single-piece or small-batch casting without requiring large batches, as the pre-heated mold is ready to receive metal immediately, reducing waiting time and material commitment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If conventional methods use precise cooling and controlled crystallization, then single crystal quality is improved, but the process is inflexible and cannot work well with additive manufacturing molds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesingle crystal qualityVSAvoidcompatibility with additive manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the cooling system adjustable and adaptable. The cooling rate and cooling pattern can be dynamically modified based on the specific requirements of the mold being used, whether conventional or additively manufactured. The system can adjust cooling intensity and distribution in real-time during the casting process to accommodate different mold geometries and materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies universality by designing a casting system that can handle both conventional molds and additively manufactured molds using the same basic apparatus. The system's adjustable cooling and heating zones, combined with flexible mold positioning, allow it to accommodate various mold types and geometries, making the process universally applicable to different manufacturing methods while maintaining single crystal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach optimizes cooling gradients, reduces elemental segregation and defects, allows for direct loading of preheated molds, and lowers costs by enabling efficient casting of durable components suitable for additive manufacturing.

Implementation Method 1

melting an ingot within the furnace

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

reducing pressure within the second chamber to a first predetermined pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 3

adding an gas to the second chamber to raise the pressure to a second predetermined pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurisation: Pressurisation

Implementation Method 4

solidifying the liquid metal within the mold

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidifying: Freezing

Data Source

PatentUS11123791B2Method for casting a mold
Publication Date: 2021.09.21 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11123791B2 patent drawing
  • US11123791B2 patent drawing
  • US11123791B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for casting a part, that includes the steps of: introducing a mold into a first housing; engaging the first housing with a second housing to define a second chamber; melting an ingot within the furnace; reducing pressure within the second chamber to a first predetermined pressure; pouring at least a portion of the melted ingot into the mold; adding an gas to the second chamber to raise the pressure to a second predetermined pressure; moving the mold such that it is engaged with the means for cooling; and solidifying the liquid metal within the mold.