Single-Ended to Differential Circuit With Asymmetric Biasing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for converting single-ended signals to differential signals lack efficiency in amplification and power matching, particularly in applications requiring high-frequency signal processing.

Innovation Solution

A circuit design incorporating an inverting stage and a non-inverting stage with transistors, where the inverting stage has a higher bias current than the non-inverting stage, allowing for improved intermodulation strength and noise characteristics by adjusting transistor geometry and bias currents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If conventional single-ended to differential conversion techniques are used, then signal conversion is achieved, but amplification efficiency and power matching are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplification efficiencyVSAvoidsignal conversion quality
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The circuit is divided into two separate stages: an inverting stage and a non-inverting stage, each optimized for specific functions. The inverting stage handles signal inversion with higher bias current for strong drive capability, while the non-inverting stage maintains signal integrity with lower bias current, achieving both high amplification efficiency and reliable signal conversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different bias currents are applied to different stages of the circuit based on their specific requirements. The inverting stage receives a higher bias current to provide strong amplification and drive capability, while the non-inverting stage operates with lower bias current to maintain signal fidelity and reduce power consumption, optimizing overall performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Power

If higher bias current is applied to improve amplification, then amplification strength increases, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplification strengthVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Higher bias current is applied locally only to the inverting stage where strong amplification and drive capability are needed, while the non-inverting stage operates with lower bias current. This localized approach achieves the required amplification strength while minimizing overall power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The inverting stage is provided with excessive bias current relative to the non-inverting stage to ensure sufficient drive capability and amplification strength in the critical inversion path, while accepting that this creates an asymmetric current distribution that must be managed in the overall circuit design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If asymmetric bias currents are used to improve intermodulation strength, then intermodulation performance improves, but circuit symmetry is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintermodulation strengthVSAvoidcircuit symmetry
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The circuit deliberately employs asymmetric bias current distribution between the inverting and non-inverting stages to optimize intermodulation performance. The inverting stage operates with higher bias current to provide strong drive capability and improve intermodulation strength, while the non-inverting stage uses lower bias current, creating a controlled asymmetry that enhances overall signal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The circuit is segmented into two functionally distinct stages with different bias current requirements. The inverting stage is optimized for high current operation to improve intermodulation strength, while the non-inverting stage is optimized for lower current operation, allowing each segment to perform its specific function at optimal performance levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS7777575B2Circuit with single-ended input and differential output
Publication Date: 2010.08.17 APPLE INC
  • US7777575B2 patent drawing
  • US7777575B2 patent drawing
  • US7777575B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inverting stage is coupled between a single-ended in-put node and a first differential output node, and a non-inverting stage is coupled between the single-ended input node and a second differential output node. The inverting stage includes at least one transistor with a first current terminal, a second current terminal, and a control terminal, the first current terminal being coupled to the first differential output node and the control terminal being coupled to a single-ended input node. The non-inverting stage includes at least one transistor with a first current terminal, a second current terminal, and a control terminal, the first current terminal being coupled to the second differential output node, and the second terminal being coupled to the single-ended input node. A bias current of the inverting stage is larger than a bias current of the non-inverting stage.