Single Face Masonry Block with Integrated Webs and Pier

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing masonry wall construction methods face challenges in efficiently integrating reinforcement and services while minimizing material usage and ensuring structural stability, particularly in handling lateral loads and seismic activity.

Innovation Solution

The development of a building block design featuring a single face shell with integrated webs and a pier structure that allows for vertical reinforcement, service access, and efficient stacking, along with a method for constructing walls using these blocks with aligned pockets and tensioning rods to enhance stability and support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional masonry blocks with multiple face shells and thick webs are used, then structural strength and stability are improved, but material usage increases and construction efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The block is segmented into a single face shell with integrated webs and a pier structure, eliminating the need for multiple separate face shells and internal reinforcement elements. This segmentation reduces material quantity while maintaining structural integrity through the optimized web-f pier configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated web structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides structural reinforcement, creates pockets for services and insulation, enables vertical alignment for stacking, and reduces overall material consumption. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by making the block more efficient rather than stronger through added material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If reinforcement rods and service conduits are integrated into the block structure, then construction efficiency and service integration are improved, but structural stability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction efficiencyVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The pockets for reinforcement rods and service conduits are pre-formed as integral parts of the block structure during manufacturing. This preliminary action ensures that structural stability is maintained from the outset, while construction efficiency is improved as no additional drilling or modification is needed during assembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The block structure features localized variations in material distribution, with thicker web and pier sections providing structural stability while creating defined pockets for services. This local quality approach ensures that structural integrity is maintained in critical areas while allowing service integration in designated zones

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If vertical pockets are created for services and insulation, then adaptability and service integration are improved, but structural strength may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice integrationVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The pocket structure utilizes the vertical dimension within the block thickness, creating channels that extend from the front face through to the rear face. This dimensional approach allows service integration without compromising the horizontal structural continuity of the block, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Quantity of substance

If minimal webbing is used to reduce material, then material usage decreases, but ability to resist lateral loads and seismic activity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidlateral load resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The web structure employs asymmetric thickness distribution, with varying web thicknesses optimized for different structural requirements. The integrated pier provides enhanced vertical support while thinner web sections reduce material usage. This asymmetric design allows the block to resist lateral loads effectively while minimizing material consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS10094110B2Masonry wall assembly
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 MINERALBUILT LLC
  • US10094110B2 patent drawing
  • US10094110B2 patent drawing
  • US10094110B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various implementations are directed to a single face building block and masonry wall assembly and methods. Each building block includes a single face shell, first and second webs extending from an interior surface of the face shell, and a pier that has a proximal surface disposed between distal ends of the webs and a distal surface that is opposite and spaced apart from the proximal surface of the pier. Interior surfaces of the webs, the proximal surface of the pier, and a portion of the interior surface of the face shell between the webs define a pocket. In addition, the building blocks may include a ledge that extends outwardly from the distal surface of the pier. This ledge forms a channel with an upper surface of the pier stacked above the block.