Single-Grip UAV Remote Control for Intuitive Flight and Peripheral Input

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote control devices for UAVs and other remotely controlled devices are difficult for beginners to use due to the non-intuitive division of yaw, pitch, and roll controls between two joysticks, and require users to manage peripheral devices simultaneously, with complex user-defined response functions based on Newton polynomials that require many nodes and are time-consuming to configure.

Innovation Solution

A remote control device with a single grippable body for controlling yaw, pitch, and roll using force and torque, and a separate input controller for managing peripheral devices, using a Lagrange polynomial function for user-defined response curves with non-evenly spaced nodes, allowing for intuitive control and automatic selection of configuration settings based on device identifiers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If two joysticks are used to control yaw, pitch, and roll separately, then control precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates for beginners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple control functions (yaw, pitch, and roll control) into a single joystick interface. Instead of requiring separate joysticks for each axis, the system integrates all three rotational controls into one unified input device, making it more intuitive and easier to operate while maintaining control precision through software-based axis separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single joystick is designed to perform multiple control functions simultaneously. By implementing multi-functionality in a single device, the system eliminates the need for multiple specialized joysticks while preserving the ability to precisely control yaw, pitch, and roll through a unified interface that is easier for beginners to master.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If both hands are required to operate the remote control device, then control precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates when peripheral devices need to be operated simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the control functions for the remotely controlled device and peripheral devices into a single handheld remote control unit. This integration allows the user to operate both the main device and peripherals with one hand, freeing the other hand for additional tasks while maintaining precise control through the unified interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The remote control device is designed with universal functionality to control both the primary remotely controlled device and associated peripheral devices. This multi-functionality is achieved by integrating multiple control channels into a single device, allowing one-handed operation for all controls without sacrificing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Manufacturing precision

If user-defined response functions are based on Newton polynomial with multiple nodes, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse function precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the mathematical basis for response functions from Newton polynomials to Lagrange polynomials. This parameter change in the underlying mathematical model maintains the ability to define precise response curves while reducing the number of nodes required, thereby simplifying the device complexity and making configuration more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the node spacing requirement from even spacing to non-uniform spacing in the Lagrange polynomial implementation. This parameter change allows nodes to be positioned optimally for the desired response characteristics rather than being constrained to uniform intervals, achieving precision with fewer nodes and reduced complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple nodes are required to define response curves, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases during configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse curve precisionVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the polynomial basis from Newton to Lagrange, which fundamentally alters how response curves are constructed. This parameter change enables the system to achieve the same level of response curve precision with fewer nodes, directly reducing the time required for configuration while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Adaptability or versatility

If configuration settings must be manually selected from multiple stored settings, then adaptability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration adaptabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automatic selection mechanism that allows the system to self-determine the appropriate configuration settings based on device identifiers. Instead of requiring manual selection from multiple stored configurations, the system automatically matches and applies the correct settings, maintaining adaptability while significantly improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses device identifiers as feedback to automatically select the appropriate configuration settings. This feedback mechanism allows the remote control device to identify the connected remotely controlled device and automatically apply the correct configuration, eliminating manual selection while preserving adaptability across different device types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11181904B2Remote control device and system
Publication Date: 2021.11.23 GRIFFIN MICHAEL AMOR
  • US11181904B2 patent drawing
  • US11181904B2 patent drawing
  • US11181904B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A remote control device for a remotely controlled device including; a first input controller, including a grippable body which a user is able to apply a force and torque thereto with a first hand in order to be able to control yaw, pitch, roll and elevation of a remotely controlled vehicle; a second input controller enabling a user to control, with a second hand, a peripheral device associated with remotely controlled device; a communication device; and a controller, configured to: receive one or more first input and one or more second input signals from the first input controller and the second input controller respectively; and control the communication device for transmitting: a first output signal indicative of a first command based on the force and torque applied to the grippable body; and a second output signal indicative of a second command for controlling the peripheral device.