Single-Input Gene Circuit Logic for Coordinated Multi-Gene Expression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing genetic engineering applications require multiple inducers for coordinating the expression of multiple genes, which can be expensive and cause crosstalk and cell toxicity.

Innovation Solution

A single input multiplex decision expression system using a network of linked promoters and regulatory proteins to control gene expression, allowing a single input signal to regulate multiple genes through a cascade of promoter interactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple inducible promoters are used for coordinated expression of multiple genes, then gene expression coordination is achieved, but cost increases and cell toxicity occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegene expression coordinationVSAvoidcell toxicity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a universal regulatory system where a single input signal (first regulatory protein) can control multiple gene expressions through different promoter configurations. The combinatorial logic system allows one input to regulate multiple outputs (second, third, and fourth genes) through different logical operations (AND, OR, NOT gates), eliminating the need for multiple different inducers while maintaining coordinated expression control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces intermediate regulatory proteins (second and third regulatory proteins) that act as mediators between the single input signal and multiple target genes. These intermediaries translate the input signal into coordinated regulation of multiple genes, allowing complex expression patterns to be achieved through a single inducer rather than multiple direct inducer-gene pairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple inducers are used for gene expression control, then coordinated expression is achieved, but crosstalk between inducers occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordinated expressionVSAvoidcrosstalk interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a single input signal that can perform multiple regulatory functions simultaneously. The first regulatory protein serves as a universal controller that can activate or repress different gene combinations through its interaction with different promoter configurations, eliminating crosstalk that would arise from using multiple different inducers with overlapping specificities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the regulatory parameter from multiple independent inducers to a single input signal with variable expression levels. By controlling the concentration or activity level of the single input signal, different gene expression patterns can be achieved without the crosstalk problems associated with multiple inducers, as the system responds to the magnitude rather than the identity of multiple signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a single input signal is used to control multiple genes, then cost is reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost reductionVSAvoidpromoter and regulatory network complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the regulatory function into modular promoter components with specific logical operations (AND gates, OR gates, NOT gates). Each promoter is designed to respond to specific combinations of regulatory proteins, allowing complex logic to be built from simple, standardized modules. This modular segmentation makes the system designable and predictable despite the complexity of controlling multiple genes with a single input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages complexity by changing parameters at the promoter design level rather than requiring complex regulatory proteins. The promoters are engineered with specific binding sites and affinities that encode the logical relationships, transforming the complexity from the regulatory protein interactions to the promoter sequence design, which can be systematically optimized and characterized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12624401B2Single input multiplex decision systems and methods of using the same
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 TECHNION RES & DEV FOUND LTD
  • US12624401B2 patent drawing
  • US12624401B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention is directed to a single input multiplex decision expression system, and a method of using same, such as for expressing a reporter protein.