Single-Layered Floating Gate Nonvolatile Memory Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing nonvolatile memory devices with stacked gate structures are complex and require control gate electrodes, whereas single-layered floating gate devices without control gates are less efficient in terms of memory cell scaling and performance.

Innovation Solution

A nonvolatile memory device design featuring single-layered floating gates that overlap with sidewall surfaces of a drain mesa, allowing for increased coupling capacitance without expanding the cell's planar area, enabling efficient programming and erasure operations, and allowing twin cells to share a drain mesa for enhanced bit density.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a stacked gate structure with control gate electrode is used, then memory cell performance and reliability are improved, but device complexity and manufacturing process difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvememory cell performanceVSAvoidgate structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the control gate electrode from the stacked gate structure, retaining only the floating gate. This simplifies the device structure while maintaining the essential charge storage function, thereby reducing manufacturing complexity without completely sacrificing memory cell performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the structural parameters by transitioning from a multi-layer stacked gate to a single-layer floating gate configuration. This parameter change simplifies the device architecture and reduces the number of fabrication steps required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If a single-layered floating gate without control gate is used, then device complexity is reduced and manufacturing is simplified, but coupling capacitance and programming efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate structure complexityVSAvoidprogramming efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from a planar gate structure to a three-dimensional configuration where the floating gate extends along the sidewall surface of the drain mesa. This vertical/dimensional extension increases the effective coupling area and capacitance without adding horizontal planar complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The floating gate is nested along the sidewall surface of the drain mesa, utilizing the vertical space and surface area of the existing drain structure. This nesting approach maximizes the coupling interface between the gate and channel region without requiring additional lateral space or complex multi-layer stacking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Use of energy by moving object

If floating gate extends along sidewall surface of drain mesa, then coupling capacitance increases and programming efficiency improves, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming efficiencyVSAvoidfloating gate alignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the formation of the floating gate with the existing drain mesa structure. By utilizing the sidewall surface of the already-formed drain mesa as the template, the floating gate self-aligns to the correct position, reducing the need for separate high-precision alignment steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Area of stationary object

If twin cells share a drain mesa, then bit density and area efficiency are improved, but isolation and cross-talk control become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecell areaVSAvoidsignal isolation
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the substrate into distinct regions using isolation layers that physically divide adjacent twin cells. This segmentation approach allows shared drain mesas to be electrically isolated from each other, preventing cross-talk while maintaining the area efficiency benefits of the shared structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances memory cell performance by increasing coupling ratios, allowing for scalable memory devices with improved programming and erasure efficiency, and enables the storage of multiple bits in reduced cell area, facilitating integration into system-on-chip technologies.

Implementation Method 1

overlapping with a sidewall surface of the drain mesa... increasing coupling capacitance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS9634102B2Nonvolatile memory devices having single-layered floating gates
Publication Date: 2017.04.25 SK HYNIX INC
  • US9634102B2 patent drawing
  • US9634102B2 patent drawing
  • US9634102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A nonvolatile memory device includes a plurality of twin cells arrayed on a substrate. Each of the plurality of twin cells includes a drain mesa protruding from a surface of a substrate. A first source and a second source are disposed in the substrate and spaced apart from the drain mesa. A first floating gate overlaps with a first sidewall surface of the drain mesa and extends onto the first source, and a second floating gate overlaps with a second sidewall surface of the drain mesa and extends onto the second source. Related methods are also provided.