Single-Leg Tight Structure for Reversible Wear and Less Waste

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tights are delicate, prone to damage, generate significant waste, and are not suitable for users with only one leg, leading to discomfort and hygiene issues, with single-leg designs often requiring pairs and causing material waste.

Innovation Solution

A single-leg tight design featuring a leg section and a waist section with an opening for the second leg, allowing for reversible wear and reduced material use, incorporating varying materials and constructions for enhanced durability and comfort.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional tights are made to cover the entire body below the waist, then they provide complete leg coverage, but they generate significant material waste due to being easy to damage and requiring replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the traditional two-legged tight into separate single-leg units, each with its own waist section and leg section. This segmentation allows each unit to be optimized for durability while covering only the necessary area, reducing material waste when one leg is damaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the configuration parameter from two-legged to single-leg coverage, fundamentally altering how the garment is structured and worn. This parameter change enables reduced material usage while maintaining functional integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of substance

If conventional tights are made as single-leg designs, then they reduce material waste, but they require pairs and still cause material waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial wasteVSAvoidusability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The single-leg tight is designed with universal applicability through its waist section that can accommodate either leg, and the leg section that can be worn on the engaged side or disengaged side. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for pairs while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetrical design where the waist section has an engaged side and disengaged side, allowing the same garment to be worn on different legs or configurations. This asymmetry enables single-unit versatility without requiring pairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Ease of operation

If conventional tights cover the entire waist and pelvic region, then they provide comprehensive coverage, but they cause discomfort and hygiene issues during use

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomfortVSAvoidhygiene
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the crotch area coverage from the traditional tight design by introducing an opening in the crotch region. This extraction eliminates the hygiene issues and discomfort associated with covering the entire pelvic region while maintaining leg coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The tight is segmented into distinct functional zones: the waist section for securing, the leg section for coverage, and the opening in the crotch region for hygiene. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its function optimally without compromising comfort or hygiene.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If single-leg tights are secured with a strap across the midsection, then they can be held in place, but they cause discomfort and an unattractive appearance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddiscomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a diagonal strap across the midsection to secure the tight, the patent inverts the approach by having the waist section naturally accommodate the leg through its engaged and disengaged sides. This inversion eliminates the need for uncomfortable diagonal straps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The waist section is designed with multi-functionality to provide both the securing function and the structural support needed for comfortable wear. The engaged side and disengaged side configuration allows the same structure to serve multiple purposes without requiring additional uncomfortable straps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260047619A1Single-leg tight
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 MEYER OLIVIA GEORGETTE
  • US20260047619A1 patent drawing
  • US20260047619A1 patent drawing
  • US20260047619A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A tight including a leg section configured to cover a first one of a user's legs, and a waist section configured to cover the user's waist, the waist section comprising an engaged side connected to the leg section, and a disengaged side configured to admit a second one of the user's legs therethrough, and an opening disposed in a crotch region, the opening comprising a first portion disposed in the waist section.