Single-Line Pick Batching With Dynamic Cart Task Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current inventory management systems lack intelligence and are inefficient, failing to balance workloads, separate orders based on items or locations, and dynamically coordinate mobile pickers with cart movement in pick-to-cart systems.

Innovation Solution

A storage fetching system that uses software, firmware, hardware, or a combination to receive order data, identify and assign tasks to carts, navigate carts to locations, instruct pickers, and confirm pick completion, dynamically adjusting operations to optimize resource utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional inventory management systems are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fulfillment center into multiple pick-to-cart areas with multiple carts operating in parallel. Each cart is independently assigned locations and monitored for capacity, allowing the system to handle diverse order requirements through modular, distributed resource allocation rather than a centralized monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts cart assignments, location assignments, and capacity monitoring in real-time based on order characteristics, cart positions, and fulfillment center conditions. The task queue system allows dynamic addition and removal of locations from cart assignments, enabling adaptive resource utilization without requiring a complex static infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If manual cart assignment is used, then system complexity is reduced, but order fulfillment speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder fulfillment speedVSAvoidassignment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-assigning locations to cart task queues before carts physically reach those locations. The system determines optimal location assignments based on order data, cart current positions, and predicted paths, preparing task queues in advance so that carts can immediately begin picking upon arrival without delay for real-time decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors cart capacity through capacity indicators and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust location assignments. When a cart approaches capacity, the system receives capacity data, determines that the cart should be removed from its current assignment, and reassigns remaining locations to other carts, maintaining optimal fulfillment speed without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If carts do not navigate efficiently, then navigation system complexity is reduced, but travel time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecart travel timeVSAvoidnavigation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system determines optimal paths and assigns locations to cart task queues in advance based on predicted cart positions and current fulfillment center conditions. By pre-calculating efficient routing sequences and preparing task queues before carts arrive, the system minimizes travel time without requiring complex real-time navigation adjustments during cart movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If picker-cart coordination is not optimized, then coordination system complexity is reduced, but picking efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepicking efficiencyVSAvoidcoordination system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service coordination by automatically monitoring cart capacity through capacity indicators and autonomously making reassignment decisions when carts approach capacity. The system receives capacity data, determines optimal reassignment actions, and updates task queues without human intervention, allowing pickers to focus on picking while the system handles coordination complexity automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12234092B2System-directed single line pick batching
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 STAPLES INC
  • US12234092B2 patent drawing
  • US12234092B2 patent drawing
  • US12234092B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system-directed single line pick batching is described. In an example implementation, the system may receive data describing a set of orders including SKU identifiers associated with items in the orders, identify an eligible cart, and assign a location to a task queue of the cart based on the location being associated with a particular SKU identifier. In some instances, the location or SKU identifier may be determined based on an order with a certain quantity of different SKU identifiers. In some instances, the system may navigate the cart to the location and instruct the item to be picked from the location. In response to completion of the pick of the item, the system may navigate the cart to an end point.