Single-Motor Spot-Joining Apparatus with Multifunctional Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spot-joining machines and methods that utilize friction stir softening require two actuators for rotary and linear motion, increasing cost, bulk, and weight, which limits their performance and maintenance, and makes them less suitable for robotic applications and reaching small spaces.

Innovation Solution

A spot-joining apparatus with a single motor that uses a multifunctional transmission to produce both rotary and linear motion, along with a transmission control apparatus to adjust the degree of engagement, allowing for efficient and flexible operation, and an upsetting die that can selectively rotate to enhance frictional heating control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If two actuators are used to produce rotary and linear motion, then the required motion functions are achieved, but the cost, bulk, and weight of the apparatus increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion control capabilityVSAvoidapparatus weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines two separate actuators (one for rotary motion and one for linear motion) into a single actuator that can produce both types of motion. This is achieved through a mechanism where the actuator's piston rod is constrained to move along a curved path, converting linear actuator motion into both rotary and linear components needed for the punch operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single actuator is designed to perform multiple functions: it generates both the rotary motion needed for friction stir softening and the linear motion needed for driving the punch into the workpiece. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate actuators, reducing overall system weight while maintaining full motion control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If two actuators are used to produce rotary and linear motion, then the required motion functions are achieved, but the bulk of the apparatus increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion control capabilityVSAvoidapparatus bulk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two separate actuator systems into one compact actuator assembly. By using a single actuator with a curved path constraint mechanism, the overall volume required for housing two actuators and their associated mounting structures is significantly reduced, making the apparatus more compact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism employs a nested arrangement where the curved path constraint is integrated within the actuator assembly itself. The guide rails or constraint structures are positioned within the actuator's operational envelope, allowing the rotary and linear motion generation components to occupy overlapping spatial volumes, thereby reducing total apparatus bulk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If two actuators are used, then the required motion functions are achieved, but the service life and maintenance cost are adversely affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion control capabilityVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By consolidating two actuators into one, the patent reduces the total number of moving parts, seals, bearings, and electrical connections that can fail. Fewer components mean fewer potential failure points, improved reliability, and reduced maintenance requirements while still achieving both rotary and linear motion control through the integrated mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If two actuators are used, then the required motion functions are achieved, but the cost of the apparatus increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion control capabilityVSAvoidapparatus cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces apparatus cost by eliminating one entire actuator system and its associated components. The single actuator design with curved path constraint is simpler and less expensive to manufacture, install, and commission than a dual-actuator system, while maintaining full functionality for both rotary and linear motion generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

5Volume of moving object

If the apparatus is made more compact, then it can reach smaller spaces, but the transmission mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus bulkVSAvoidtransmission mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The curved path constraint mechanism is nested within the actuator assembly, with guide rails and constraint structures integrated into the actuator's operational space. This nested arrangement allows the transmission of both rotary and linear motion through a compact configuration without requiring external transmission mechanisms, thus reducing overall apparatus bulk while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The single-motor system reduces cost and bulk, improves service life, and allows for more versatile and efficient operation, enabling the apparatus to reach smaller spaces and handle various materials effectively, while the upsetting die provides greater control over frictional heating for improved adherence and faster processing.

Implementation Method 1

a motor; a first transmission configured to transfer rotary motion of the motor to the punch

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a first transmission configured to transfer rotary motion of the motor to the punch when engaged

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical transmission: Gear

Implementation Method 3

a second transmission configured to convert rotary motion of the motor to linear motion of the punch

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical conversion: Screw

Implementation Method 4

Sliding friction between the probe and the workpiece layers causes the layers to soften and plasticise without melting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction heating: Friction

Implementation Method 5

the rotation of the probe displaces the material and causes the plasticised portions of the two layers to intermingle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10464122B2Spot-joining apparatus and methods
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 ATLAS COPCO IAS UK LIMITED
  • US10464122B2 patent drawing
  • US10464122B2 patent drawing
  • US10464122B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spot-joining apparatus comprises a motor, a punch for driving a fastener or performing a clinching or friction stir spot welding operation, a first transmission, a second transmission and a transmission control apparatus. The first transmission is configured to transfer rotary motion of the motor to the punch when engaged. The second transmission is configured to convert rotary motion of the motor to linear motion of the punch, and thereby drive the punch towards a workpiece, when engaged. The transmission control apparatus is arranged to selectively adjust the degree of engagement of at least one of the first and second transmissions. Further apparatus for spot joining, and methods of spot-joining, are also disclosed.