Single-Pass Code Analysis via Dependency Map Construction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing code compilation techniques struggle to efficiently analyze and produce target artifacts from source programming languages, particularly in improving the quality and production of code in target programming languages.

Innovation Solution

The techniques involve traversing a tree representation of a program to generate a map data structure in a single pass, mapping the tree and its subtrees to respective data structures that include variables declared, read, and modified, as well as array references, to construct a chain of dependencies between results observed at each node.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional multi-pass code analysis techniques are used, then comprehensive code analysis can be achieved, but analysis time and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode analysis completenessVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by collecting all variable declarations, reads, and modifications in a single forward pass through the code, storing them in data structures (declared_vars, read_vars, modified_vars) before subsequent analysis passes. This preliminary collection enables comprehensive code analysis in later passes without requiring multiple analysis traversals, thus reducing total analysis time while maintaining completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the code analysis process into distinct data structures for different variable categories (declared variables, read variables, modified variables, array references). By dividing the analysis into separate tracked categories rather than a monolithic analysis, the system achieves comprehensive coverage through organized segmentation that enables efficient single-pass collection and subsequent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If detailed tracking of all variables and dependencies is performed, then code optimization quality improves, but data structure complexity and memory usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode optimization qualityVSAvoiddata structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating specific, targeted data structures for different types of variable information: declared_vars for variable declarations, read_vars for variable reads, modified_vars for variable modifications, and array_refs for array references. Each data structure is optimized for its specific purpose rather than using a single complex structure, enabling detailed tracking with manageable local complexity for each variable category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary data structures (the four tracked collections) that serve as mediators between the source code and the final optimization decisions. These intermediaries organize and structure the raw code information in a way that simplifies subsequent analysis and optimization, reducing the complexity burden by creating structured intermediate representations rather than directly processing raw code.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If single-pass tree traversal is used, then processing speed improves, but ability to capture complex dependencies may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddependency information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains continuity of useful action by performing continuous collection of variable information throughout the single-pass tree traversal. As the traversal visits each node, it continuously updates the four data structures with declarations, reads, and modifications. This continuous collection ensures no dependency information is lost despite the single-pass approach, as every relevant code element is captured during its first encounter in the traversal sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The single-pass traversal performs preliminary action by collecting all variable dependency information in the first traversal before any optimization or analysis passes. By gathering complete information about declarations, reads, modifications, and array references during this initial pass, the system eliminates the need for re-traversals to capture dependency information, maintaining both speed and completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250147742A1Read, Write, And Array Tracking In Code Representations
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US20250147742A1 patent drawing
  • US20250147742A1 patent drawing
  • US20250147742A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Read, write, and array tracking may be performed for a tree representing a program or a portion of a program. A tree may be obtained from a compiler or an interpreter. The tree may be traversed to generate a map data structure in a single pass, constructing a chain of dependencies between results observed at each node visited as part of traversing the tree.