Single-Piece Display Box with Tear-Line Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional display boxes, either 'twin pack' or single piece designs, face issues with material duplication, resistance when stacked, and aesthetically undesirable tear lines, which compromise the finish and functionality of the display window.

Innovation Solution

A single-piece display box made from a cut and stamped sheet with creased and tearable folding lines, featuring a double front that can be removed via a lateral tear line, minimizing perforations and cuts, and ensuring a perfectly finished display window without visible tears, enhancing stacking resistance and reducing material duplication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If twin pack display boxes are used, then the box can be separated into lower and upper parts for display, but the manufacturing process becomes complex and execution time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay conversion capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The single sheet is segmented into functional zones (base section, lateral sections, front part, back part) with predetermined fold lines and tear lines that allow the box to be converted into a display case by separating specific portions along these lines, achieving display adaptability without complex manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sheet is pre-configured with fold lines, creases, and tear lines during manufacturing, so that at the distribution point, conversion to display mode simply requires pulling along the predetermined tear lines, eliminating complex assembly steps and reducing execution time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If twin pack display boxes are used, then the box can be separated for display, but stacking resistance is weakened due to cuts and perforations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay conversion capabilityVSAvoidstacking resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The design uses strategic fold lines and minimal tear lines positioned only where separation is needed for display conversion, preserving the integrity of the main structural walls and maintaining stacking resistance while enabling display adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sheet structure has different properties in different zones: the lateral and back sections maintain full structural integrity for stacking, while the front part and flaps are designed with tear lines for display conversion, optimizing both strength and adaptability locally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Loss of substance

If single piece display boxes are used, then material duplication is reduced, but the display window edge becomes badly finished due to tearing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial duplicationVSAvoiddisplay window edge finish
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The display window edge is pre-cut with a finished appearance during sheet manufacturing, and the tear lines are strategically positioned away from the window edge, so that when the box is converted to display mode, the window maintains its factory-finished appearance without tear damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The double front part containing the tear lines is designed to be completely removed from the box, extracting the tearing action away from the display window area, allowing the window edge to remain intact and aesthetically finished

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Loss of substance

If single piece display boxes are used, then material duplication is reduced, but tear lines diminish resistance and are aesthetically undesirable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial duplicationVSAvoidstructural resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The sheet is divided into sections connected by fold lines rather than requiring multiple separate pieces, eliminating material duplication while confining tear lines to non-structural areas (front part and flaps) where they do not compromise overall structural resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The structural walls (lateral and back sections) are designed without tear lines to maintain strength and resistance, while the front part and flaps are designed with tear lines for easy removal, achieving material efficiency without sacrificing structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP1967454B1One piece double fronted display box
Publication Date: 2009.08.26 SAICA EMBALAJE CENT
  • EP1967454B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1967454B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP1967454B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

Display box assembly in one piece based on a single sheet which is provided with two large lateral sections, joined by a section which, when the box is assembled, adopts a back position and emerging from the ends of the large lateral front sections one of which is joined by means of a tear line so that it may be removed, and another which has a window which is pre-cut in the factory with finished edges, where it joins the double front, which is fitted in a groove made for this purpose on the double front, with the closing tab being at a lower height than the double front, as this is arranged on its inside face. Due to its configuration, material is not duplicated, the display window is provided with finished edges, and a box is obtained which is easier to stack, and which is made from one piece and its assembly may be mechanised, without the need for any special machinery.