Single Reactor System for Sequential Light Olefin Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing chemical processing technologies lack a flexible reactor system capable of efficiently handling multiple types of reactions, such as dehydrogenation, cracking, dehydration, and methanol-to-olefin reactions, using different feed streams without the need for separate reactor systems.

Innovation Solution

A method and reactor system design that allows for the sequential processing of two different chemical feed streams in a single reactor, utilizing different catalysts and reaction types for each stream, with the reactor sections configured to operate as fast fluidized, turbulent, or bubbling bed reactors and dilute phase riser reactors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If separate reactor systems are used for each reaction type (dehydrogenation, cracking, dehydration, methanol-to-olefin), then each reaction can be optimized for its specific feed stream, but capital costs increase and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability to handle multiple reaction typesVSAvoidnumber of separate reactor systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor system is designed to perform multiple reaction types (dehydrogenation, cracking, dehydration, and methanol-to-olefin reactions) within a single integrated unit. The reactor can be configured with different catalysts and operating conditions to handle various feed streams, eliminating the need for separate dedicated reactors for each reaction type while maintaining optimization for each specific process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate reactor systems are used for each reaction type, then reaction optimization is improved, but capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction type specializationVSAvoidcapital costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple reactor systems that would traditionally be required for different reaction types are merged into a single integrated reactor system. This consolidation reduces capital costs by eliminating redundant equipment while maintaining the ability to perform each reaction type with appropriate catalysts and operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If a single reactor system handles multiple reaction types, then capital costs are reduced, but the reactor design complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapital costsVSAvoidreactor design flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reactor system incorporates dynamic configurability through removable and replaceable catalyst cartridges, allowing the reactor design to adapt to different reaction requirements. This dynamic element enables a single reactor structure to handle multiple reaction types by simply changing the catalyst configuration, rather than requiring complex fixed designs for each reaction type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If different catalysts are used for different feed streams, then reaction efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction efficiencyVSAvoidcatalyst management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The catalyst system is segmented into separate removable cartridges, each optimized for specific reaction types. This segmentation allows efficient catalyst management by enabling independent replacement and optimization of each catalyst unit without affecting the entire system, thereby maintaining high reaction efficiency while simplifying catalyst management procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces capital costs by eliminating the need for separate reactor systems and allows for the selection of the most economical feed stream and reaction type, while maintaining high efficiency in producing light olefins.

Implementation Method 1

contacting a first feed stream with a first catalyst in a reactor, wherein the contacting of the first feed stream with the first catalyst causes a first reaction which forms a first product stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

contacting a second feed stream with a second catalyst in the reactor, wherein the contacting of the second feed stream with the second catalyst causes a second reaction which forms a second product stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 3

the reactor comprises an upstream reactor section operating as a fast fluidized, turbulent, or bubbling bed reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Data Source

PatentEP3596029B1Methods for making light olefins from different feed streams
Publication Date: 2025.05.07 DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • EP3596029B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3596029B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3596029B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

According to one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, chemical streams may be processed by a method which may comprise operating a first chemical process, stopping the first chemical process and removing the first catalyst from the reactor, and operating a second chemical process. The reaction of the first chemical process may be a dehydrogenation reaction, a cracking reaction, a dehydration reaction, or a methanol-to-olefin reaction. The reaction of the second chemical process may be a dehydrogenation reaction, a cracking reaction, a dehydration reaction, or a methanol-to-olefin reaction. The first reaction and the second reaction may be different types of reactions.