Single Roller Slide-Out Mechanism for RVs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing slide-out systems for motorized or towable vehicles are heavy, bulky, and costly due to their design requiring dual rollers and wide sliding members, which increases material usage and weight, making them inefficient in terms of space and manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A slide-out system utilizing a single support roller and rail gear positioned asymmetrically under the inner rail, combined with a retaining slide and low-friction pads, to reduce the width and material requirements of the rails, allowing for a more cost-effective and lighter design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If dual rollers and wide sliding members are used to support the slide-out room, then structural stability is improved, but weight and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes one roller from the traditional dual-roller configuration, extracting only the essential support function while eliminating redundant components. This reduction directly decreases weight and material usage while maintaining adequate structural stability through the retained single roller and optimized sliding member design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric positioning of the single roller and sliding member components, concentrating support functions at specific locations rather than distributing them symmetrically. This asymmetric arrangement allows for narrower sliding members and reduced material usage while maintaining structural stability where it is most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Stability of the object's composition

If dual rollers and wide sliding members are used to support the slide-out room, then structural stability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By extracting one roller from the dual-roller system, the patent reduces the number of components that require manufacturing, assembly, and quality control. This directly lowers manufacturing costs while maintaining essential structural stability through the optimized single-roller configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The asymmetric design allows for more efficient manufacturing by concentrating support functions in specific areas, reducing the overall size and complexity of sliding members. This leads to lower material costs, reduced manufacturing time, and simplified assembly processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Force

If dual rollers and wide sliding members are used, then load-bearing capacity is improved, but space efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidspace efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts unnecessary rolling support functions, retaining only the essential single roller that provides adequate load-bearing capacity. This reduction allows for narrower sliding members that occupy less space within the vehicle interior while still supporting the slide-out room effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

By positioning the single roller asymmetrically at optimal locations, the patent concentrates load-bearing capacity where it is most needed rather than distributing it uniformly. This asymmetric support arrangement maintains adequate load-bearing capacity while minimizing the width of sliding members and maximizing space efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in narrower, lighter, and less expensive slide-out systems that maintain structural integrity while minimizing material usage and production costs, offering improved installation and shipping benefits.

Implementation Method 1

a single support roller and a retaining slide, while a rail gear drives a gear rack on the inner rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a rail gear drives a gear rack on the inner rail to cause extension or retraction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear mechanism: Gear

Implementation Method 3

Additional support is provided by a retaining slide attached to the inner rail that slides against retaining lip on the outer rail

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS7540549B2Single roller slide-out mechanism
Publication Date: 2009.06.02 DEXTER AXLE CO LLC
  • US7540549B2 patent drawing
  • US7540549B2 patent drawing
  • US7540549B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, the present invention provides a slide-out system comprising an inner rail that slides into and out of an inner rail. The inner rail is supported within the outer rail by a single support roller and a retaining slide, while a rail gear drives a gear rack on the inner rail to cause extension or retraction. This arrangement allows the rails of the slide-out system to be narrower than those used in many popular flush-floor slide-out systems in use today.