Single Spar Composite Airfoils Reducing Fastener Count

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional structural composite airfoils for aircraft require large numbers of fasteners, increasing costs, manufacturing time, and weight, which complicates their construction and aerodynamic performance.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a primary structural element with an upper skin panel, a lower skin panel, and a middle C-channel spar, where the upper skin panel extends from the leading edge to the trailing edge, and the lower skin panel is coupled to the upper leading edge end within the leading edge region, reducing the need for splice straps and other fasteners, and utilizing core stiffened materials for enhanced strength and aerodynamics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional construction with three spars is used, then structural strength is improved, but fastener count and manufacturing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidfastener count
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes one spar from the conventional three-spar configuration, extracting only the necessary structural support elements. This reduces the number of fasteners required to attach spars to skin panels, directly addressing the contradiction by simplifying the assembly while maintaining adequate structural strength through the remaining two spars positioned at critical locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the functions of multiple structural elements by integrating the spar attachments directly into the skin panel design. The skin panels are configured to work in conjunction with the reduced number of spars, combining the load-bearing functions that would otherwise require separate components and fasteners, thereby reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Strength

If conventional construction with three spars is used, then structural strength is improved, but manufacturing cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By extracting one spar from the conventional three-spar design, the patent reduces the number of attachment operations required during manufacturing. This directly decreases manufacturing cycle time while the remaining spars are positioned to maintain necessary structural strength at critical load-bearing locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The skin panels are designed with pre-configured attachment features that facilitate easier and faster connection to the reduced number of spars. This preliminary design of the skin panel structure enables more efficient assembly operations, reducing manufacturing cycle time without compromising the strength of the final assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If conventional construction with three spars is used, then structural integrity is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidairfoil weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts one spar from the conventional three-spar configuration, directly reducing the weight of the airfoil structure. The remaining two spars are strategically positioned to maintain structural integrity at critical locations, achieving weight reduction while preserving necessary strength characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Shape

If core stiffened materials are used, then aerodynamic performance is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs core stiffened composite materials that provide enhanced aerodynamic shaping and structural performance. The composite construction allows for complex aerodynamic contours to be formed as integral parts of the skin panels, achieving superior aerodynamic performance while the composite nature of the materials enables these complex shapes to be manufactured as single pieces, reducing overall manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11572152B2Structural composite airfoils with a single spar, and related methods
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 THE BOEING CO
  • US11572152B2 patent drawing
  • US11572152B2 patent drawing
  • US11572152B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Structural composite airfoils include a primary structural element and a secondary structural element defining the trailing edge of the structural composite airfoil. The primary structural element includes an upper skin panel, a lower skin panel, and a middle C-channel spar that is coupled to the upper skin panel and the lower skin panel. The upper skin panel extends from an upper leading edge end to an upper trailing edge end, and the lower skin panel extends from a lower leading edge end to a lower trailing edge end. The lower leading edge end of the lower skin panel is coupled to the upper leading edge end of the upper skin panel within the leading edge region of the primary structural element.