Single-Stage Autohydrolysis for High C5 Yield Biomass Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydrothermal pretreatment methods for lignocellulosic biomass face challenges in optimizing C5 and C6 sugar yields while minimizing enzyme consumption and inhibitory byproducts, particularly in autohydrolysis processes, which often result in low C5 sugar yields and require complex, large-scale operations.

Innovation Solution

A single-stage autohydrolysis process at very low severity, characterized by a xylan number of 10% or higher, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis and a 'C5 bypass' strategy where xylo-oligomers are hydrolyzed post-treatment, allowing high C5 monomer yields and minimal enzyme inhibition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If conventional hydrothermal pretreatment is used to improve C5 sugar yields, then C5 sugar yield increases, but enzyme consumption increases and inhibitory byproducts are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveC5 sugar yieldVSAvoidinhibitory byproducts
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by operating autohydrolysis at very low severity conditions (high xylan number ≥10%) with controlled pH (3.5-9.0) and temperature (140-200°C), which fundamentally alters the chemical environment to prevent formation of inhibitory byproducts while preserving C5 sugars. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by achieving high C5 yield without the harmful effects of conventional severe pretreatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the hydrolysis process into distinct stages: (1) mild autohydrolysis for C5 sugar release, (2) enzymatic hydrolysis for C6 sugar conversion, and (3) post-hydrolysis for remaining C5 conversion. This segmentation allows each stage to operate under optimized conditions, preventing inhibitory byproduct formation while maximizing sugar yields, thereby resolving the contradiction between C5 yield and byproduct generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If single-stage autohydrolysis at very low severity is used, then C5 monomer yields increase to 60% or more, but C6 monomer loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveC5 monomer yieldVSAvoidC6 monomer loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the hydrolysis process into sequential stages: first autohydrolysis for C5 release, then enzymatic hydrolysis for C6 conversion, and finally post-hydrolysis for remaining C5. This segmentation ensures C6 sugars are converted in the enzymatic stage before being lost, while C5 sugars are released and converted in subsequent stages, achieving 60%+ C5 monomer yield with minimal C6 loss through process sequencing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary C5 sugar release through mild autohydrolysis before enzymatic hydrolysis, protecting C6 sugars from premature degradation. By pre-releasing C5 sugars under controlled conditions and then applying enzymatic treatment to the remaining material, the process achieves high C5 monomer yield while preserving C6 sugars for subsequent conversion, minimizing overall C6 monomer loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If conventional pretreatment is used, then sugar yield improves, but washing steps and de-toxification are required, increasing process complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesugar yieldVSAvoidwashing and de-toxification steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pretreatment parameters to very low severity autohydrolysis conditions (pH 3.5-9.0, temperature 140-200°C, high xylan number ≥10%), which fundamentally alters the chemical environment to prevent generation of inhibitory byproducts. This parameter optimization eliminates the need for washing and de-toxification steps while maintaining high sugar yield, thereby reducing process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of inhibitory byproducts into a benefit by using mild autohydrolysis conditions that selectively release C5 sugars without generating inhibitors. The process turns what would normally be a harmful effect (byproduct generation requiring de-toxification) into a beneficial selective hydrolysis, eliminating the need for additional washing and de-toxification steps while maintaining high sugar yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Productivity

If large-scale operations are used, then processing capacity increases, but economic viability decreases due to high operational costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoideconomic viability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes operational parameters (pH 3.5-9.0, temperature 140-200°C, residence time, enzyme dosage) to maximize processing efficiency and sugar yield while minimizing operational costs. By achieving high C5 monomer yields (60%+) and minimal C6 loss under these optimized conditions, the process improves economic viability while maintaining high processing capacity, resolving the contradiction between productivity and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Achieves high C5 monomer yields of 60% or more with minimal loss of C6 monomers, reducing the need for washing steps and enabling direct fermentation without de-toxification, thus enhancing the economic viability and scalability of biomass processing.

Implementation Method 1

Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass to fermentable sugars using single-stage autohydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 2

enzymatic hydrolysis with c5 bypass and post-hydrolysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic hydrolysis: Enzyme

Implementation Method 3

hydrolysing the solid fraction with or without addition of supplemental water content using enzymatic hydrolysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS20260015638A1Methods of processing lignocellulosic biomass using single-stage autohydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis with c5 bypass and post-hydrolysis
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 NEW ENERGY BLUE LLC
  • US20260015638A1 patent drawing
  • US20260015638A1 patent drawing
  • US20260015638A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates, in general, to methods of processing Lignocellulosic biomass to fermentable sugars and to methods that rely on hydrothermal pretreatment. Xylose monomer yields comparable to those achieved using two-stage pretreatments can be achieved from soft Lignocellulosic biomass feedstocks by pretreasting to very low severity in a single-stage pressurized hydrothermal pretreatment, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis to release xylose retained in the solid state. In some embodiments, pretreated biomass is separated into a solid fraction and a liquid fraction, the solid fraction subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis, and the separated liquid fraction subsequently mixed with the hydrolysed solid fraction.