Single-Voltage Pure Memristive Logic Gates for In-Memory Computing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current memristor-based logic systems, such as the IMPLY logic gate, are complex, power-intensive, and require additional circuit components, making them inefficient for performing logic operations within memristive memory structures.

Innovation Solution

The development of pure memristive logic gates that utilize a single control voltage to operate, integrating memristive devices in series or parallel configurations to perform logical operations, such as NOT, AND, and OR gates, without the need for sequential voltage activation or extra circuit components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If IMPLY logic gate is used in memristive crossbar, then logic operations can be performed, but the device complexity increases due to requiring extra circuit components such as controller and additional resistors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogic operation capabilityVSAvoidcircuit components
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the additional circuit components (controllers, extra resistors) from the memristive crossbar structure, leaving only the essential memristor elements to perform logic operations. This simplifies the overall device architecture while maintaining logic functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the memristor serve multiple functions: it acts as both memory storage element and logic gate component. The same memristor that stores data also performs the logic operation, eliminating the need for separate logic circuitry and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Extent of automation

If IMPLY logic gate is used, then logic operations can be performed, but power consumption increases due to sequential voltage activation in different locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogic operation capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic voltage activation where a single control voltage is applied sequentially to different memristors in a regular pattern, enabling logic operations without requiring complex simultaneous multi-location activation. This periodic approach reduces peak power consumption while maintaining operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The memristor automatically performs both data storage and logic computation functions without requiring external control circuits or additional power management components. The device self-regulates its operation based on the applied voltage, reducing overall system power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Extent of automation

If IMPLY logic gate is implemented, then logic operations can be performed, but computation complexity increases due to sequential voltage activation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogic operation capabilityVSAvoidcomputation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from complex sequential multi-location voltage activation to a simpler single control voltage applied in a periodic manner. This parameter simplification reduces computation complexity while maintaining the ability to perform logic operations through the inherent memristor characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Extent of automation

If extra circuit components are added for IMPLY logic gate, then logic operations can be performed, but the device becomes less efficient for in-memory computing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelogic operation capabilityVSAvoidin-memory computing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the memory function and logic computation function into a single integrated structure using only memristors. By combining these functions in the same physical substrate without additional components, the system achieves true in-memory computing efficiency where data processing occurs directly where data is stored.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies memristive logic operations, reduces power consumption, and enables logic operations to be performed within memory arrays, offering a more efficient and intuitive method for computing compared to traditional systems.

Implementation Method 1

Chua proposed a forth fundamental component in addition to the three already well known fundamental electronic components: the resistor, capacitor, and inductor. Chua and Kang extended the memristor theory to memristive systems. Memristors and memristive devices are simple two-terminal resistors, where the resistance is changed by the electrical current.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMemristive effect: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentUS10284203B2Pure memristive logic gate
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 TECHNION RES & DEV FOUND LTD
  • US10284203B2 patent drawing
  • US10284203B2 patent drawing
  • US10284203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment of the invention there is provided a device and method. The device may include a pure memristive logic gate, wherein the pure memristive logic gate consists essentially of at least one input memristive device and an output memristive device that is coupled to and differs from the at least one memristive device; wherein the pure memristive device is controlled by a single control voltage.