Sintered Cemented Carbide Articles with Selective Binder Deposition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing techniques for cemented carbide and cermet articles using binder jetting result in uneven distribution of metallic binder phase and high porosity, leading to suboptimal material properties and increased risk of article breakage during debinding.

Innovation Solution

A method involving selective binder application, where binder is added to the entire surface of bottom and top portions and only the outer parts of middle portions, forming a shell structure around loose powder, followed by sintering to achieve a uniform distribution of metallic binder phase and reduced porosity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If binder is added to the entire surface of each layer in traditional binder jetting, then the green body structure is formed, but the metallic binder phase accumulates in large areas leading to uneven distribution and suboptimal material properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of binder phase distributionVSAvoidamount of binder phase accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating binder application across different regions of the article. The bottom and top portions receive binder on their entire surfaces, while the middle portion receives binder only on outer parts (within a predetermined distance from the outer surface). This creates a non-uniform binder distribution pattern that prevents excessive binder accumulation in the middle region, thereby achieving more uniform overall binder phase distribution in the sintered article.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If traditional binder jetting is used to manufacture cemented carbide articles, then the articles can be produced, but they exhibit high porosity and increased risk of breakage during debinding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to breakage during debindingVSAvoiddebinding time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces porosity and breakage risk by applying binder locally rather than uniformly. By restricting binder application in the middle portion to only outer regions, the resulting green body has reduced overall porosity while maintaining structural integrity. This local quality approach creates a more dense structure that is less prone to breakage during debinding and allows for reduced debinding time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If powder with lower metallic binder phase content is used, then hardness can be increased, but the material becomes more brittle and difficult to process using traditional methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardness of sintered articleVSAvoidprocessability of powder composition
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the key parameter of binder distribution from uniform to non-uniform. By controlling where binder is applied (entire surface for bottom/top portions, outer parts only for middle portion), the process enables use of powder compositions with lower metallic binder phase content. This parameter change in binder application strategy makes it possible to process and manufacture articles from powders that would be too brittle for traditional manufacturing, while achieving higher hardness in the final sintered article.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces sintered articles with improved material properties, reduced debinding time, lower risk of breakage, and allows for the use of powders with lower metallic binder phase content, resulting in more uniform microstructure and higher hardness compared to traditional methods.

Implementation Method 1

d) sintering the printed article

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS20250229331A1Method for manufacturing a sintered article and a sintered article
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 SANDVIK MACHINING SOLUTIONS AB
  • US20250229331A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229331A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229331A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for additively manufacturing a sintered article from a powder composition having granules of cemented carbide or cermet includes the steps of additively manufacturing a bottom portion of the article by depositing a plurality of layers of powder composition, and adding binder to the entire surface of each layer of the bottom portion. The method further includes additively manufacturing a middle portion of the article by depositing a plurality of layers of powder composition, and adding binder to only the outer parts of each layer of the middle portion. The method further includes additively manufacturing a top portion of the article by depositing a plurality of layers of powder composition, and adding binder to the entire surface of each layer of the top portion, thereby producing a printed article, and sintering the printed article, wherein the porosity of the granules in the powder is 0-15 wt %.