Sintered Compact Machinability via High-Density Green Compacts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing sintered body manufacturing methods, such as PTL 1, face challenges in machinability and productivity due to the need for calcination, which increases the hardness of metal powder particles, making machining difficult and requiring melting of machining chips for reuse, and involve a large number of steps that reduce productivity.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses uniaxial pressing to produce a green compact with a high and uniform relative density, allowing easy machining without calcination, enabling faster machining, longer tool life, and the reuse of machining chips, while applying compressive stress to prevent chipping and cracking, and achieving a sintered body with a relative density of 93% or more.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If calcination is performed to increase mechanical strength of the compact, then chipping and cracking during machining are reduced, but the hardness of the compact increases making machining more difficult and requiring melting of chips for reuse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strength of compactVSAvoidmachinability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing pressure molding to create a green compact with high mechanical strength before machining, eliminating the need for calcination. The green compact achieves sufficient strength for machining through optimized pressure molding parameters, allowing direct machining without thermal treatment that would increase hardness and complicate chip disposal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If calcination is performed to prevent chipping during machining, then the compact is easier to machine, but the number of manufacturing steps increases reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip resistance during machiningVSAvoidmanufacturing cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the calcination step by performing preliminary pressure molding that creates a green compact with sufficient mechanical strength and chip resistance for direct machining. This consolidation of steps removes unnecessary thermal processing from the manufacturing sequence, directly improving productivity while maintaining machining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the green compact is machined directly without calcination, then productivity increases, but chipping and cracking may occur during machining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing throughputVSAvoidstructural integrity during machining
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing pressure molding parameters (pressure, temperature, time) to create a green compact with enhanced mechanical properties. This parameter optimization allows direct machining of the green compact without calcination, maintaining structural integrity and preventing chipping while improving productivity through step elimination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If pressure molding is used to produce green compact, then the compact can be machined without calcination, but the relative density must be sufficiently high to prevent chipping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachinability of green compactVSAvoidrelative density uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing pressure molding conditions (applied pressure, molding time, temperature) to achieve uniform high relative density throughout the green compact. This ensures the compact has sufficient density uniformity to prevent chipping during direct machining while maintaining the simplicity and productivity benefits of avoiding calcination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances machinability, increases productivity, allows for complex shapes like helical gears, and ensures dimensional stability, resulting in a sintered body with mechanical strength comparable to solidified metal bodies, suitable for high-load applications like automobile components.

Implementation Method 1

since the green compact is calcined, particles of the metal powder are sintered to some extent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentEP3441161B1Method for manufacturing sintered compact, and sintered compact
Publication Date: 2024.07.17 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD
  • EP3441161B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3441161B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3441161B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A sintered body manufacturing method includes: a preparation step of preparing a raw material powder containing an iron-based metal powder; a molding step of subjecting the raw material powder to uniaxial pressing using a die to produce a green compact having an overall average relative density of 93% or more; a machining step of machining the green compact to produce a machined compact; and a sintering step of sintering the machined compact to obtain a sintered body.