Sintered Dental Preform Nesting for Chair-Side Milling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for creating dental restorations from ceramic materials require separate steps of milling porous ceramic designs and sintering them to full density, which limits the ability to produce chair-side ceramic restorations and increases patient wait times.

Innovation Solution

A method for making custom dental restorations using a machinable sintered preform that can be directly shaped into final form without additional sintering, utilizing unique preform designs, nesting strategies, and machining techniques to reduce processing time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If separate steps of milling porous ceramic designs and sintering them are used, then manufacturing precision and material strength are improved, but processing time and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestoration shape precisionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The preform is pre-sintered to a partially dense state with controlled porosity before the final machining step. This preliminary sintering action creates a material that can be efficiently milled while minimizing post-processing time, as the preform already has sufficient structural integrity to hold its shape during machining without requiring full densification afterward.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention combines the sintering and machining operations into a more integrated process flow. By controlling the sintering degree during preform creation and then performing precision machining on this pre-sintered material, the separate steps of full sintering then machining are merged into a coordinated sequence that reduces total processing time while maintaining both precision and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Strength

If separate steps of milling porous ceramic designs and sintering them are used, then material strength is improved, but device complexity and process steps increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestoration strengthVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The preform undergoes preliminary sintering to achieve a controlled degree of densification before final machining. This preliminary action creates a material structure that balances machinability with final strength requirements, eliminating the need for complex multi-stage sintering processes after machining.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the density parameter of the ceramic material during the preforming stage, creating a preform with intermediate density that is easier to machine than fully dense ceramic but still maintains sufficient strength. This parameter change allows simplification of the overall process by eliminating the need for post-machining sintering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional mill blanks with single size and shape are used, then ease of manufacture is improved, but material waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblank manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The preform is created with a density distribution that varies locally - the regions that will become the final restoration have higher density and less porosity, while surrounding areas maintain lower density for easier machining. This local quality variation allows the preform to be tailored to the specific restoration geometry, minimizing material waste while maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the density parameter of the preform material to create a gradient structure that optimizes both manufacturability and material efficiency. By controlling the degree of sintering locally in different regions of the preform, the process achieves near-net-shape manufacturing that significantly reduces material waste compared to traditional uniform blanks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of time

If fully sintered materials are shaped directly without post-shaping sintering, then processing time is reduced, but manufacturing precision may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshaping processing timeVSAvoidrestoration dimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The preform undergoes preliminary sintering to achieve a controlled intermediate density state before final machining. This preliminary action creates a material that is easier to machine with higher precision than fully dense ceramic, while the controlled porosity allows for tighter dimensional tolerances during the machining process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes the density parameter of the preform material to fall within a specific range that balances machinability and dimensional accuracy. By controlling the sintering degree to create a preform with 30-70% theoretical density, the material achieves optimal properties for precision machining without requiring post-shaping sintering, thus maintaining manufacturing precision while reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250152315A1Methods of Making Dental Restorations from Sintered Preforms
Publication Date: 2025.05.15 JAMES R GLIDEWELL DENTAL CERAMICS
  • US20250152315A1 patent drawing
  • US20250152315A1 patent drawing
  • US20250152315A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for shaping a custom dental restoration from a preform, wherein the preform comprises a preform body and a preform stem. A method is further disclosed for generating one or more nesting positions for the restoration design within the geometry of the preform body relative to the position of the preform stem. A method is further disclosed for generating machining instructions based on the selected nesting position to optimize machining for chair-side applications.