Sintered Object Inspection via Simulation-Guided Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for inspecting 3D printed objects post-sintering, particularly for detecting cracks, are inefficient and prone to missing small defects due to the need for manual inspection or complex automated processes that require numerous images from various perspectives.

Innovation Solution

An inspection device that predicts potential defects through simulation, allowing targeted image capture of high-risk areas, reducing the number of images needed for analysis and enhancing the likelihood of detecting cracks by focusing on anticipated damage zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection is used to detect defects in sintered objects, then inspection flexibility is maintained, but detection reliability deteriorates due to human error and oversight of small cracks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection reliabilityVSAvoidinspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system uses simulation-based prediction to automatically identify high-risk areas and configure inspection parameters without human intervention. The system serves itself by using process simulation data to guide the inspection process, eliminating the need for manual inspection while maintaining high reliability through automated, objective defect detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs simulation-based prediction of potential defects before the actual inspection takes place. By predicting where defects are most likely to occur based on process parameters and simulation models, the system prepares inspection configurations in advance, focusing resources on critical areas and improving detection reliability before inspection begins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If numerous images from various perspectives are captured to ensure complete defect coverage, then detection completeness improves, but inspection time and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection completenessVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly inspecting the entire object, the system applies local quality by focusing inspection resources on specific high-risk areas predicted by simulation. Different inspection parameters and imaging perspectives are selectively applied only to regions where defects are most likely to occur, rather than treating all areas equally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial inspection by capturing images only from perspectives and at resolutions necessary for detecting predicted defects in high-risk areas. Rather than capturing excessive images of the entire object, the system applies imaging actions selectively where needed, reducing total image count while maintaining detection completeness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If generic inspection parameters are used for all objects, then inspection process simplicity is maintained, but detection precision deteriorates for specific defect types and locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection precisionVSAvoidinspection parameter configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes inspection parameters based on simulation predictions. Recording parameters such as image resolution, lighting conditions, and imaging perspective are adjusted according to the specific defect risks identified for each object, enabling precise detection tailored to predicted defect types and locations rather than using fixed generic settings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11983862B2Inspection device and method for checking an object produced by sintering for defects
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • US11983862B2 patent drawing
  • US11983862B2 patent drawing
  • US11983862B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inspection device and a method for checking an object produced by sintering for potential defects, wherein if at least one predefined prerequisite is satisfied, at least one image is recorded of at least part of the object via an imaging device in the inspection device, and it is checked by the inspection device whether a defect can be detected in the object in at least one image. A predication relating to a potential defect in the object is provided to the inspection device prior to recording the at least one image, and at least one imaging parameter is determined on the basis of the prediction, wherein the at least one image is recorded on the basis of the at least one determined imaging parameter.