Sintered Metal Retainer Infiltrated with Bronze

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional retainer manufacturing processes are inefficient for low-volume production, requiring high tooling investments and being either time-consuming or expensive, and they compromise on material properties such as tribological characteristics depending on the material used.

Innovation Solution

A retainer made from sintered powdered metal infiltrated with bronze, produced using additive manufacturing (3D printing) processes, which eliminates the need for initial tooling and combines superior strength and tribological characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional manufacturing processes (stamping or injection molding) are used for high-volume production, then productivity is improved, but device complexity and initial tooling investment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction volumeVSAvoidtooling investment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the manufacturing parameter from conventional stamping/injection molding to additive manufacturing (3D printing), enabling production without large initial tooling investments while maintaining efficiency for both high and low-volume production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical stamping and injection molding processes with additive manufacturing technology, substituting a process that requires extensive tooling with one that builds parts layer-by-layer from digital models, eliminating the need for expensive molds and dies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If machining from solid block is used for low-volume production, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetooling investmentVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional machining processes with additive manufacturing, substituting subtractive manufacturing (removing material) with additive manufacturing (building material), dramatically reducing production time while maintaining low tooling requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary digital modeling and simulation before production, allowing complex retainer geometries to be manufactured directly from 3D models without requiring time-consuming machining operations, enabling rapid production even for low volumes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If steel is used for retainer material, then strength is improved, but tribological characteristics deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidtribological characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials combining steel or polymer with bronze infiltration, achieving both the high strength of steel and the superior tribological characteristics of bronze, eliminating the need to choose between the two material properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different material properties to different regions of the retainer by infiltrating bronze into specific areas that require tribological performance, while maintaining the structural strength of the base steel or polymer material in load-bearing regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables cost-effective production of retainers with improved strength and reduced wear and friction, suitable for both high and low production volumes, and allows for customizable features not possible with traditional methods.

Implementation Method 1

The body is made of a sintered powdered metal infiltrated with bronze

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 2

The body is made of a sintered powdered metal infiltrated with bronze

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInfiltration: Permeation

Data Source

PatentUS9945419B2Retainer
Publication Date: 2018.04.17 THE TIMKEN CO(US)
  • US9945419B2 patent drawing
  • US9945419B2 patent drawing
  • US9945419B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A retainer (30) for maintaining a relative angular spacing of a plurality of rolling elements includes a body (34) having an annular portion (38) and a plurality of engaging portions (42). Each of the engaging portions is configured to engage at least one of the plurality of rolling elements. The body is made of a sintered powdered metal infiltrated with bronze.