Sintered Circular Saw Tips With Built-In Rake and Flank Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complex shape of cutting edge tips in metal cutting circular saws requires multiple grinding processes, leading to high labor and cost expenses in achieving the desired cutting performance.

Innovation Solution

A method using upper and lower punches and a mortar die to form and sinter metal tips with predetermined angles and shapes, eliminating the need for extensive grinding by shaping the tip-forming metal material into a substantially rectangular parallelepiped shape with specific clearance and rake angles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If multiple grinding processes are used to achieve complex cutting edge tip shapes, then cutting performance is improved, but manufacturing cost and labor time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting edge tip shape precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary action by pre-forming the cutting edge tip shape during the sintering process itself, rather than forming it afterward through multiple grinding operations. The mold cavity is designed with the precise final shape including rake face, flank, clearance angle, and chip groove, so the tip is formed correctly from the beginning, eliminating the need for subsequent grinding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the shaping function from the grinding process and integrates it into the sintering process. By incorporating the shape-forming capability directly into the mold cavity design, the complex multi-step grinding operation is removed entirely, leaving only the essential sintering and forming steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If multiple grinding operations are performed to create fine designs on rake face and flank, then cutting performance improves, but production time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting performanceVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary action by creating all fine design features (rake face geometry, flank geometry, clearance angles, chip dividing grooves) during the initial sintering process. The mold cavity is precisely engineered to produce the final complex shape in one operation, so no time-consuming subsequent grinding or machining operations are required, dramatically improving production efficiency while maintaining cutting performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If conventional grinding methods are used to form tip shapes, then precise angles are achieved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclearance angle and rake angle precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the angle-forming function from the grinding process and incorporates it into the mold cavity design. The precise clearance angles and rake angles are built into the mold geometry itself, allowing these critical angular features to be formed during sintering without requiring expensive precision grinding operations, thereby reducing manufacturing cost while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the shaping function with the sintering process. Instead of separating forming and sintering into distinct operations (as in conventional grinding methods), the mold cavity performs both functions simultaneously - the cavity shape defines the final tip geometry including all angles and surfaces, and the sintering process consolidates the material to achieve the final dense form with precise geometry in one integrated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method simplifies and cost-reduces the manufacturing process by forming tips with precise angles through uniaxial forming and sintering, eliminating the need for conventional grinding and enabling efficient production of multiple tips simultaneously.

Implementation Method 1

sintering the tip formed product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS20240367247A1Method for manufacturing tip for metal cutting circular saw and method for manufacturing metal cutting circular saw using the same
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 TANI TETSUKU
  • US20240367247A1 patent drawing
  • US20240367247A1 patent drawing
  • US20240367247A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The method for manufacturing a substantially rectangular parallelepiped tip 1 includes using an upper punch 25 for pressing a sand-like tip-forming metal material SM from above, a lower punch 26 for pressing the tip-forming metal material SM from below, and a mortar die 21 into which the tip-forming metal material SM is injected, making a lower surface 25a of the upper punch 25 into a forming surface of a rake face 2 side portion of the tip 1, making an upper surface 26a of the lower punch 26 into a forming surface of an opposite side surface 11 portion of the rake face 2 of the tip 1, and making one side inner surface 24a of the cavity 24 of the mortar die 21 into a forming surface of a flank 5 portion of the tip 1.