Sintered Tool Head Assembly With Integrated Coolant Channels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for manufacturing tool heads of rotary cutting tools require expensive post-sintering machining for coolant channels, limiting the complexity and efficiency of coolant supply to cutting edges.

Innovation Solution

A method that forms coolant channels in the interface between preformed parts using grooves, allowing for non-linear, complex shapes without sharp transitions, enabling efficient coolant supply to all cutting edges without post-sintering machining, using techniques like powder injection moulding or multiaxial pressing, and sintering to create a cost-effective and performance-enhanced tool head.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If coolant channels are formed by post-sintering machining (e.g., EDM), then manufacturing precision of coolant channels can be achieved, but production cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant channel precisionVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent forms coolant channels as grooves in the green body before sintering, rather than machining them after sintering. This preliminary formation of channels using molding techniques avoids expensive post-sintering machining operations like EDM, thereby reducing production costs while maintaining adequate channel precision for coolant flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical post-sintering machining (EDM) with a molding-based approach where channels are formed as grooves in the green body during the forming stage. This substitution eliminates the need for expensive mechanical machining operations after sintering, reducing both cost and production time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If coolant channels have complex non-linear shapes, then coolant distribution to all cutting edges is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant distribution efficiencyVSAvoidchannel shape complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent forms complex non-linear coolant channels as grooves in the green body before sintering, utilizing molding techniques that can create complex geometries directly. This preliminary formation allows complex channel shapes to be achieved without proportionally increasing manufacturing complexity, as the grooves are formed during the molding stage rather than requiring complex post-processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates three-dimensional non-linear coolant channels by forming grooves in the green body that extend through multiple dimensions. The channels can curve and change direction in complex ways, allowing coolant to reach all cutting edges effectively. The groove formation process naturally accommodates these complex spatial configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If coolant channels have sharp transitions or edges, then manufacturing is simpler, but pressure drops occur reducing tool head performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel formation simplicityVSAvoidcoolant flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent forms coolant channels with curved walls without sharp transitions or edges by creating grooves in the green body that naturally produce smooth contours. The groove formation process allows for curved channel walls that eliminate sharp edges, thereby preventing pressure drops in coolant flow while maintaining ease of manufacture through the molding process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method reduces production costs and improves tool head performance by eliminating the need for expensive machining and ensuring effective coolant distribution to all cutting edges, enhancing the tool's efficiency and dynamic properties.

Implementation Method 1

Joining the assembled parts in a sintering operation to form the tool head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Data Source

PatentEP3488952B1A method for manufacturing a tool head
Publication Date: 2024.03.13 SECO TOOLS AB
  • EP3488952B1 patent drawingFigure 1~5
  • EP3488952B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7
  • EP3488952B1 patent drawingFigure 8~10

AI summary

A method for manufacturing a tool head, comprising: - forming a first and a second part (4, 4') from a powder composition, wherein the first and the second parts comprise corresponding joining surfaces (5), and wherein the parts comprise outer surface portions (6, 6') configured to form portions of a peripheral envelope surface of the tool head, - forming corresponding grooves (15) in the corresponding joining surfaces, - assembling the parts into a shape of a tool head by bringing the joining surfaces into contact to form an interface, so that each pair of corresponding grooves forms a channel extending in the interface, the channel having an inlet opening in a rear end of the tool head and an outlet opening in a front end or in the peripheral envelope surface of the tool head, - joining the assembled parts in a sintering operation to form the tool head.