Sintering Apparatus Bottom-Up Gas Delivery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sintering apparatuses face challenges in preventing undesired deformation, oxidation, and discoloration of workpieces during high-temperature sintering, particularly due to inefficient protective gas distribution and consumption, leading to suboptimal sintering results.

Innovation Solution

A sintering apparatus with a gas feed arranged on the side of the base area facing away from the sintering chamber, featuring a through-flow region that allows direct introduction of protective gas into the sintering chamber, ensuring effective protection of the workpiece through a clean and stable gas atmosphere, using a base area with permeable structures such as through-flow openings or open-pore regions, and optionally incorporating an oxygen-adsorbing supporting material.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If protective gas is introduced into the sintering chamber from above through a quartz tray filled with inert beads, then the workpiece is protected during sintering, but a relatively great amount of protective gas is consumed and remains of another gas (particularly oxygen) can still cause impairments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection qualityVSAvoidprotective gas consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The gas feed is inverted from the conventional top-down approach to a bottom-up approach. The gas feed is arranged on the side of the base area facing away from the sintering chamber, and protective gas is introduced through the base area from below. This inversion allows direct gas delivery to the workpiece underside, improving protection quality while reducing gas consumption and oxygen contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If the base area is made permeable to protective gas with through-flow regions, then direct and complete protective gas delivery is achieved, but the structural complexity of the base area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotective gas delivery efficiencyVSAvoidbase area structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The base area is designed with through-flow regions that are permeable to protective gas. These permeable structures allow direct gas delivery through the base area to the workpiece, achieving complete protective gas coverage while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure through the use of integrated porous or perforated base area design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Manufacturing precision

If sintering is performed at very high temperatures above 1200°C, then complete sintering of the workpiece is achieved, but undesired discoloration and oxidation occur more frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesintering completenessVSAvoidoxidation and discoloration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention establishes an inert protective gas atmosphere by introducing protective gas through the base area from below and allowing it to flow upward through through-flow regions. This bottom-up gas flow creates a reliable inert environment that prevents oxidation and discoloration even at very high sintering temperatures above 1200°C, enabling complete sintering without harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures direct and complete protective gas delivery to the workpiece, minimizing oxidation and discoloration, while maintaining a simple apparatus design and reducing gas consumption, even at high sintering temperatures above 1200°C, resulting in high-quality sintered products.

Implementation Method 1

the base area has at least one through-flow region (14) that is permeable to the protective gas for the introduction of the protective gas coming from the gas feed (5) into the sintering chamber (18)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow through permeable structure: Permeation

Implementation Method 2

wherein the supporting material (3) lies on the base area (6) and the protective gas coming from the gas feed (5) is directed to the workpiece (2) only through the supporting material (3)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS10322453B2Sintering apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 AMANN GIRRBACH
  • US10322453B2 patent drawing
  • US10322453B2 patent drawing
  • US10322453B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sintering apparatus (4) for sintering at least one workpiece (2), more particularly a dental workpiece, having a sintering chamber (18) for receiving the sintering workpiece (2) during sintering, wherein the sintering chamber (18) is delimited by a base surface (6) of the sintering apparatus (4) on which the workpiece can be placed during sintering, wherein the sintering apparatus (4) has at least one gas feed (5) for introducing protective gas into the sintering chamber (18), wherein the gas feed (5) is on the side of the base surface (6) that faces away from the sintering chamber (18) and the base surface (6) has at least one flow-through portion (14) which is permeable to the protective gas to allow the protective gas coming from the gas feed (5) to pass into the sintering chamber (18).