Topology-Optimized Sintering Supports for Complex AM Parts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for designing support structures in additive manufacturing are inefficient, time-consuming, and unsuitable for parts with complex geometries, leading to gravity-based deformations and dimensional inaccuracies during the sintering process.

Innovation Solution

An automated method using iterative topology optimization to generate optimized support structures that counteract predicted gravity-based distortions and shrinkage, minimizing support material volume while ensuring dimensional tolerances, by applying gravity loads and boundary constraints to the part's design space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual methods are used to design support structures, then the designer can rely on experience and knowledge, but the process becomes inefficient, time-consuming, and not repeatable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepeatability of support designVSAvoidefficiency of support design process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical design processes with an automated computational system that uses simulation and optimization algorithms. The system automatically generates support structures by applying physics-based simulations of the sintering process, eliminating reliance on human experience while improving repeatability and efficiency simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the computational algorithm to autonomously design support structures without human intervention. The automated process takes part geometry as input and independently determines optimal support configurations, making the design process both repeatable and efficient

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional support design methods are used, then simple geometries can be supported, but complex geometries experience large distortions during sintering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle complex part geometriesVSAvoiddimensional accuracy during sintering
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by simulating the sintering process and predicting distortions before actual manufacturing. It pre-calculates the optimal support structure configuration that will counteract anticipated gravity-based distortions, enabling complex geometries to maintain dimensional accuracy throughout the sintering process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization process dynamically adjusts support structure parameters such as material distribution, support location, and support geometry to counteract predicted distortions. The system iteratively modifies these parameters to achieve both complex geometry support and dimensional precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If support material volume is increased to reduce distortions, then dimensional tolerances can be maintained, but the amount of support material and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional tolerances of the partVSAvoidvolume of support material
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The topology optimization algorithm iteratively changes the material distribution parameters within the design space, adjusting support density and location to achieve the minimum support volume required to maintain dimensional tolerances. This eliminates excessive support material while preserving precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by varying support material distribution non-uniformly across the design space. Supports are concentrated in regions where they are most needed to counteract distortions, while other regions use minimal or no support material, optimizing the balance between precision and material usage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables the efficient and repeatable design of support structures for complex parts, minimizing distortions and achieving required dimensional tolerances, even for large and complex geometries, thereby improving the manufacturing process and reducing costs and time.

Implementation Method 1

applying gravity load and boundary constraints to the model of the part and the defined design space to determine a prediction of the predicted gravity-based distortions to the part due the AM process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

the TO support structure is optimized to further counteract a predicted shrinkage of the part during the AM process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal shrinkage: Thermal Contraction

Data Source

PatentEP3798895B1Optimized support design for sintering parts with complex features
Publication Date: 2023.12.06 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • EP3798895B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3798895B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3798895B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and system to receive a specification defining a model of a part to be produced by an additive manufacturing (AM) process; define a design space to enclose the part and a support structure for the part, the support structure to support the part and printed with the part during the AM process; execute an iterative topology optimization(TO) based at least in part on the specification for the part and the defined design space, to generate a TO support structure that counteracts predicted gravity-based distortions during the AM process; save a record of the generated TO support structure; and transmit the record of the TO support structure to an AM controller, the AM controller to control an AM system to generate an instance of the part and the TO support structure based on the record.