Sinusoidal Tear Element Webbing for Fall Arrest Energy Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tear away shock absorbers in personal fall arrest systems fail to consistently meet the dynamic drop test standards set by American and Canadian National Standards, posing a risk to worker safety.

Innovation Solution

A two-ply webbing energy absorber with sinusoidal exterior and interior tear elements made of high tenacity polyester yarns, designed to decelerate a falling worker by tearing under load, is integrated into the lanyard system, ensuring compliance with safety standards through controlled elongation and peak load management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If a tear away shock absorber is designed to be lightweight and compact, then portability and ease of integration are improved, but the ability to consistently pass dynamic drop test standards deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of shock absorberVSAvoidconsistency in passing dynamic drop test
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The shock absorber is divided into two separate webbing layers (first and second webbing) with tear elements positioned between them. This segmentation allows each layer to contribute independently to energy absorption while maintaining overall compactness and lightness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite construction with two webbing layers and tear elements made of high tenacity polyester yarns. The combination of these materials creates a lightweight yet reliable structure that consistently meets dynamic drop test standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Loss of energy

If tear elements are designed to tear away under load to absorb energy, then shock absorption is improved, but control over peak load and elongation parameters deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capacityVSAvoidcontrol over peak load and elongation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Tear elements are strategically positioned at specific locations between the webbing layers where they will selectively tear under load. This localized placement ensures controlled energy absorption while maintaining precise control over peak load (not exceeding 900 pounds) and elongation (not exceeding 42 inches) parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The tear elements are designed with specific physical properties and dimensions that determine their tearing behavior. By controlling the parameters of the tear elements (material composition, dimensions, positioning), the invention achieves both effective energy absorption and precise control over load and elongation parameters to meet safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively decelerates a falling worker's descent, meeting the dynamic performance standards by maintaining peak loads under 900 pounds and elongation within 42 inches, enhancing safety and compatibility with existing systems.

Implementation Method 1

The tear elements are designed to tear away decelerating the workers rate of fall and thus remove the shock at impact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture Mechanics: Fracture Mechanics

Data Source

PatentUS7815013B2Energy absorber for personal fall arrestor
Publication Date: 2010.10.19 STURGES MFG
  • US7815013B2 patent drawing
  • US7815013B2 patent drawing
  • US7815013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An energy absorber for use in a personal fall arresting system. The absorber contains upper and lower webbings which are each two ply members. The back ply of the upper webbing is mounted adjacent to the face ply of the lower webbing with said webbing being of about equal length and width. Exterior tear elements run back and forth sinusoidally between attachment points on the face ply of the upper webbing and the back ply of the lower webbing. Interior tear elements run back and forth sinusoidally between attachment points on the back ply of the upper webbing and the top ply of the lower webbing.