Site-Calibrated Object Detection Rules for Fewer Surveillance False Alarms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing network-based video surveillance systems face challenges in achieving accurate real-time object detection due to limited processing resources, resulting in less than 75% accuracy with high false alarm rates, necessitating improved calibration of rule sets for individual camera locations.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for calibrating post-processing rule sets using scene description parameters, including object data, region identifiers, and time periods, to enhance object detection accuracy by segmenting the field of view and applying customized rules based on actual camera locations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If real-time object detection processing is performed using practical object detection models, then processing speed is improved, but detection accuracy deteriorates to less than 75%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection process into two distinct stages: (1) real-time object detection using a practical model with limited resources, and (2) post-processing rule-based validation using scene description parameters. This segmentation allows the system to maintain fast real-time detection while improving accuracy through additional rule-based filtering in the post-processing stage, resolving the contradiction between speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary calibration during a calibration period to determine scene description parameters (object data, region identifiers, time periods) before actual detection begins. This preliminary action creates a customized rule set for the specific camera location that is then applied during real-time detection, enabling the system to achieve high accuracy without compromising processing speed during operational phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If compute resources are moved to edge devices (smart video cameras), then real-time processing capability is improved, but processing power is still limited compared to cloud-based servers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time processing capabilityVSAvoidprocessing power availability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces rule-based post-processing as an intermediary mechanism between the edge device's object detector and the final detection results. This intermediary layer uses lightweight rule evaluations based on pre-determined scene description parameters to improve detection reliability without requiring additional heavy compute resources at the edge device, thus maintaining real-time capability while enhancing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a simplified copy of scene understanding capabilities through rule-based post-processing rather than attempting to run full-scale AI models at the edge. By copying essential scene context information into pre-determined rules during calibration, the system achieves reliable detection at the edge device with limited resources, avoiding the need for cloud-based processing while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If object detection accuracy is improved through better models, then detection reliability is improved, but false alarm rates remain high due to practical limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through rule-based post-processing that evaluates detected objects against scene-specific rules determined during calibration. This feedback mechanism filters out false positives by checking whether detected objects conform to expected scene patterns (e.g., objects in appropriate regions, during appropriate time periods), thereby reducing false alarm rates while maintaining high detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used for detection evaluation by incorporating scene description parameters (region identifiers, time periods, object data) into the detection process. Instead of relying solely on raw object detection model output, the system evaluates detections against multiple scene-specific parameters, significantly reducing false alarms while maintaining high accuracy for true detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If customized rule sets are created for each camera location, then detection accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calibration during an initial period to determine all scene description parameters and create customized rule sets for each camera location before actual detection begins. This preliminary action consolidates the complexity into a one-time setup process, allowing the rule sets to be stored and reused during operational phases without adding ongoing complexity to the detection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal calibration framework that can be applied to any camera location. The same calibration process and rule structure are universally applicable across different cameras and locations, requiring only that the system go through the calibration process to adapt to specific local conditions. This universality reduces overall system complexity by using a standardized approach rather than requiring custom solutions for each location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12494063B2Site-based calibration of object detection rules
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 SANDISK TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US12494063B2 patent drawing
  • US12494063B2 patent drawing
  • US12494063B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for site-based calibration of object detection rules, such as for surveillance video cameras, are described. Video data from a video image sensor may be processed using an object detector to determine object data for a detected object. The object data may be post-processed using a post-processing rule set to determine whether the detected object violates the post-processing rule set. Event notifications to a video surveillance application may be prevented responsive to the object data violating the post-processing rule set.