Multi-Category Site Controller Management in Building Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current building management systems lack the ability to efficiently categorize and manage multiple site controllers within a single enterprise, leading to difficulties in applying common configurations and operational settings across sites, especially in large-scale deployments.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system that allows users to create and manage site controllers within multiple categorical groupings, using OpusSiteCategory identifiers and additional database tables to enable querying and configuration of sites across categories, facilitating consistent management and reporting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple categorical groupings are implemented for site controllers, then the ability to query and manage sites across categories is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional database tables and identifiers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to query and manage sites across categoriesVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments site controller management into multiple categorical groupings using separate database tables (e.g., OpusSiteCategory table) and identifiers. Each category represents a distinct dimension for organizing and querying sites, allowing the system to handle complex multi-dimensional queries without consolidating all data into a single monolithic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The OpusSiteCategory identifier acts as an intermediary between the site controllers and the categorical groupings. This intermediary enables efficient querying and management by providing a standardized reference point that connects sites to their respective categories across multiple dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If manual integration methods are used for deploying site controllers, then the implementation complexity is reduced, but the time and effort required for deployment increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of deploymentVSAvoiddeployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring categorical groupings and establishing the OpusSiteCategory framework before actual site controller deployment. This preliminary setup enables automated querying and management operations, eliminating the need for manual integration efforts during subsequent deployments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual integration mechanisms with automated database-driven query systems. Instead of manually integrating and configuring each site controller, the system uses structured database tables and identifiers to automatically manage and query sites across categories, significantly reducing deployment time and effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10565532B2Building management system site categories
Publication Date: 2020.02.18 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US10565532B2 patent drawing
  • US10565532B2 patent drawing
  • US10565532B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach relating to providing a user an ability to place sites into multiple categories and providing applications an ability to query a configuration for members of the categories. The approach not only may provide a user an ability to easily create, deploy, modify and monitor a multi-site enterprise hundreds and thousands of remote building management system site controllers and allow the user to establish each site within the context of a single enterprise group, but it may also incorporate where the site controllers can be identified, sorted or managed within multiple categorical groupings. For example, categorical groupings may facilitate managing the configurations at the sites, applying an operational setting by selecting a logical category, applying common operating parameters to multiple sites, and so forth.