Site Controller Coordination for Cost-Aware DER Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to effectively aggregate distributed energy resources (DERs) in a coordinated manner to provide utility-requested power levels without adversely affecting electricity consumers, failing to consider site-specific factors like planned activities and DER size.

Innovation Solution

A centralized aggregation engine optimizes the aggregation of DERs by determining economically efficient maneuvers for individual sites, considering their unique conditions and costs, to achieve a net power change while minimizing total electricity-related costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If DERs are aggregated in a coordinated manner to provide utility-requested power levels, then grid stability and power delivery are improved, but site-specific factors like planned activities and DER size are not considered, leading to increased costs for individual sites

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrid stabilityVSAvoidsite-specific cost optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the aggregation problem into two levels: centralized aggregation engine that coordinates overall DER aggregation for grid stability, and site controllers that optimize individual site operations. This segmentation allows simultaneous achievement of grid-wide reliability and site-specific cost optimization by distributing decision-making authority appropriately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by enabling each site controller to consider site-specific factors (planned activities, DER size, local costs) while contributing to the overall aggregation. Each site operates with customized parameters and constraints that reflect its unique characteristics, rather than applying uniform aggregation rules to all sites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Power

If additional T&D systems are constructed to satisfy peak demand, then power delivery capability is improved, but construction costs increase significantly with infrequent utilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak demand capacityVSAvoidinfrastructure construction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple distributed energy resources across different sites into a coordinated virtual power plant. By aggregating DERs from numerous sites, the system achieves peak demand capacity that would be prohibitively expensive to build through traditional centralized T&D infrastructure, while avoiding the high construction costs of duplicating utility-scale generation and transmission assets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The aggregation engine provides multi-functionality by enabling DERs to serve multiple purposes: local site optimization, utility-requested aggregation for peak demand, and autonomous operation. This universal system replaces the need for dedicated infrastructure built solely for peak demand scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If independent DERs operate autonomously without coordination, then site autonomy and simplicity are maintained, but coordinated power delivery to maintain grid stability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesite autonomyVSAvoidcoordinated power delivery
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic operation modes that allow site controllers to switch between autonomous operation and coordinated aggregation based on utility requests and site conditions. This dynamic flexibility maintains site autonomy when aggregation is not needed while enabling coordinated power delivery when grid stability requires it, resolving the contradiction between independence and coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12483030B2Site controllers of distributed energy resources
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 ENEL X NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US12483030B2 patent drawing
  • US12483030B2 patent drawing
  • US12483030B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for economically optimal control of an electrical system. Some embodiments employ generalized multivariable constrained continuous optimization techniques to determine an optimal control sequence over a future time domain in the presence of any number of costs, savings opportunities (value streams), and constraints. Some embodiments also include control methods that enable infrequent recalculation of the optimal setpoints. Some embodiments may include a battery degradation model that, working in conjunction with the economic optimizer, enables the most economical use of any type of battery. Some embodiments include techniques for load and generation learning and prediction. Some embodiments include consideration of external data, such as weather.