Site-Specific Antibody-Drug Conjugates via Cysteine Mutations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) face challenges in achieving site-specific conjugation, leading to variability in drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) and systemic toxicity, with non-specific conjugation methods affecting stability and pharmacokinetics.

Innovation Solution

The development of ADCs where the drug moiety is conjugated to specific interchain cysteine residues, with substitutions of cysteine residues by other amino acids and modifications in the heavy chain, such as substitutions at positions 234 and 235, to enhance site-specificity and reduce toxicity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If non-specific conjugation methods are used (lysine side chains or reduced disulfide bonds), then manufacturing is easier, but drug-to-antibody ratio variability and systemic toxicity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconjugation process simplicityVSAvoiddrug-to-antibody ratio consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces site-specific cysteine residues at defined positions (e.g., hinge region, CH1, CL domains) to enable localized conjugation. This creates distinct conjugation zones with controlled drug attachment, ensuring uniform DAR while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through targeted chemical reactions at specific antibody locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies antibody structure by introducing specific cysteine mutations (e.g., L234C, L235C substitutions) and controlling oxidation conditions to generate defined numbers of sulfhydryl groups. These parameter changes in amino acid sequence and reaction conditions enable precise control over DAR and reduce batch-to-batch variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If non-specific conjugation methods are used, then manufacturing is easier, but systemic toxicity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconjugation process simplicityVSAvoidsystemic toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By restricting conjugation to specific cysteine residues at defined antibody locations (hinge region, heavy or light chains), the patent ensures uniform drug distribution and prevents off-target effects. This localized approach reduces systemic toxicity while maintaining ease of manufacture through standardized site-specific protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs controlled oxidation conditions and chemical environments to selectively activate cysteine residues only at intended conjugation sites. This controlled chemical 'pressure' ensures drugs attach only where designed, preventing non-specific binding and reducing systemic toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Manufacturing precision

If site-specific conjugation is achieved through amino acid substitution, then DAR consistency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrug-to-antibody ratio consistencyVSAvoidantibody engineering complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces site-specific cysteine residues at defined positions (e.g., hinge region, CH1, CL domains) to enable localized conjugation. This creates distinct conjugation zones with controlled drug attachment, ensuring uniform DAR while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through targeted chemical reactions at specific antibody locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies antibody structure by introducing specific cysteine mutations (e.g., L234C, L235C substitutions) and controlling oxidation conditions to generate defined numbers of sulfhydryl groups. These parameter changes in amino acid sequence and reaction conditions enable precise control over DAR and reduce batch-to-batch variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Stability of the object's composition

If site-specific conjugation is achieved through amino acid substitution, then pharmacokinetic stability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveADC pharmacokinetic stabilityVSAvoidantibody engineering complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces site-specific cysteine residues at defined positions (e.g., hinge region, CH1, CL domains) to enable localized conjugation. This creates distinct conjugation zones with controlled drug attachment, ensuring uniform DAR while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through targeted chemical reactions at specific antibody locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies antibody structure by introducing specific cysteine mutations (e.g., L234C, L235C substitutions) and controlling oxidation conditions to generate defined numbers of sulfhydryl groups. These parameter changes in amino acid sequence and reaction conditions enable precise control over DAR and reduce batch-to-batch variability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11702473B2Site-specific antibody-drug conjugates
Publication Date: 2023.07.18 ADC THERAPEUTICS SA
  • US11702473B2 patent drawing
  • US11702473B2 patent drawing
  • US11702473B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Site-specific antibody-drug conjugates are described, in particular conjugates comprising pyrrolobenzodiazepines (PBDs) having a labile protecting group in the form of a linker. The site of conjugation, along with modification of the antibody moiety, allows for improved safety and efficacy of the ADC.