Situational-Awareness Access Resolution for Adaptive Physical Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional physical access control systems for residential applications fail to address the unique needs of children, pets, the elderly, and individuals with disabilities, and do not provide adequate security measures against unauthorized access or unauthorized actions once access is granted.

Innovation Solution

A layered architecture system that utilizes multi-modal sensing, confidence-based assessment, and multi-staged pipelines to monitor and manage access events, incorporating abstraction and integration principles to enhance security and convenience, allowing for dynamic and context-aware access control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional physical access control systems are used, then basic access control is provided, but they fail to address unique needs of children, pets, elderly, and individuals with disabilities, and do not provide adequate security measures against unauthorized actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to unique user needsVSAvoidsecurity against unauthorized actions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments access control into multiple stages: pre-access detection zone, access resolution zone, and post-access monitoring zone. Each stage has specific sensors and processing logic tailored to detect different user needs and security risks independently, allowing customized responses for children, pets, elderly, or disabled users while maintaining security at each stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts access control decisions based on real-time situational assessment. Multiple sensors continuously monitor user behavior, environmental context, and device responses, allowing the system to adapt security measures and access granting in real-time rather than using fixed rules, thereby addressing diverse user needs while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multi-stage capture pipeline is implemented, then detection accuracy is improved, but resource usage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidresource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection in a pre-access zone using low-power sensors before full access resolution is required. Motion sensors and basic identifiers are captured first, and only when genuine access intent is detected does the system activate higher-power sensors and processing for detailed identification, thereby improving detection accuracy while conserving resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-stage capture pipeline operates periodically rather than continuously. Sensors are activated in sequence based on detected activity levels, with full sensor arrays only engaged when access events are detected. This periodic operation maintains high detection accuracy when needed while significantly reducing average resource consumption during normal idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250316122A1Systems, apparatus, and methods for access resolution based on situational awareness
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 DURIN INC
  • US20250316122A1 patent drawing
  • US20250316122A1 patent drawing
  • US20250316122A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatus, and methods for access resolution based on situational awareness. The system adapts to the behaviors of users and provide more secure, more natural operation. Unlike existing solutions that are focused on a single factor/multi-factor authentication and binary outcomes (grant/deny), the exemplary “physical access resolution” system assesses the entire access event (not just identity) and may responsively launch multiple resolutions at points throughout the access event (not just a binary decision). Various entities employ layers of abstraction and integration between logical layers to allow for integration across nodes. Information collection may be staged and handled with varying levels of privacy protections. Access resolution may be implemented according to multi-modal and/or confidence-based metrics.