Six-Axis Interpolation Turning for Collision-Free Undercut Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing interpolation turning methods are limited by fixed tool chuck inclination and rigid workpiece holders, leading to inaccessible machining areas and collision risks, especially for asymmetrical workpieces with rotationally symmetrical sections.

Innovation Solution

A method and machine tool employing six-axis simultaneous interpolation turning, allowing flexible tool positioning relative to the workpiece, with simultaneous control of three translational and two rotary axes, enabling continuous adjustment of the tool's engagement with the workpiece to avoid collisions and access previously inaccessible areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If fixed tool chuck inclination is used in interpolation turning, then the machine structure is simpler, but machining areas become inaccessible and collision risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine structureVSAvoidaccessibility to machining areas
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the tool chuck inclination adjustable during machining operations. The tool bearing is designed to incline the height axis S about the A and/or B axes, allowing the inclination angle to be dynamically changed based on the workpiece geometry and machining requirements. This resolves the contradiction by enabling the system to adapt its configuration rather than being fixed, thus improving accessibility to difficult-to-reach areas while maintaining structural simplicity through controlled adjustability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of tool chuck inclination angle from a fixed value to a variable parameter that can be adjusted during machining. The control system enables continuous adjustment of the inclination angle to optimize the cutting tool's engagement with the workpiece, allowing access to previously inaccessible machining areas without fundamentally redesigning the machine structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If rigid workpiece holder is used, then the workpiece positioning is stable, but the workpiece and tool cannot move relative to each other to avoid collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece positioning stabilityVSAvoidrelative movement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic capability to the workpiece holder system by enabling rotational movement about height axis Z and linear displacement parallel to it. The mounting direction M of the workpiece holder can be inclined with respect to height axis Z, allowing the workpiece to move relative to the tool during machining. This maintains positioning stability through controlled motion rather than rigidity, resolving the contradiction between stability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If constant tool chuck inclination is maintained, then the control system is simpler, but complex workpiece geometries cannot be machined without collisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol systemVSAvoidmachining capability for complex geometries
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is designed to dynamically adjust the tool chuck inclination angle during machining operations. The numerical control device coordinates the movement of the tool bearing to incline the height axis S about the A and/or B axes, enabling the cutting tool to access complex workpiece geometries without collisions while maintaining relatively simple control logic through standardized motion control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If additional rotary axes are added for flexible tool positioning, then accessibility to machining areas improves, but the machine structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool positioning flexibilityVSAvoidmachine structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves flexible tool positioning by making existing axes multi-functional. The tool bearing not only supports standard linear movements but also provides inclination capability about A and/or B axes. The workpiece holder provides both stable mounting and rotational/displacement capability. This multi-functionality approach delivers enhanced adaptability without proportionally increasing structural complexity, as existing components perform multiple functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP4625075A1Interpolation turning
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 TEBIS TECHNISCHE INFORMATIONSSYSTEME AG
  • EP4625075A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4625075A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4625075A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Disclosed are a method and an electronic machine control and a machine tool with which a six-axis interpolation turning of rotationally symmetrical sections (7a) of workpieces (7) is possible.