Size-Tunable Nanoparticle Synthesis via Halide Precursors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for synthesizing cadmium-free quantum dots, such as InP nanocrystals, face challenges including high toxicity of reactive phosphorous precursors, low chemical yield, and high production costs, which hinder industrial-scale production and application in fields like in-vivo imaging and lighting.

Innovation Solution

A method involving mixing indium halides with tris(diethylamino)phosphine or tris(diethylamino)arsine as precursors, under controlled heating and inert atmosphere, to achieve high chemical yield and tunable particle sizes without cadmium, using a cost-effective and scalable process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If highly reactive phosphorous precursors like (TMS)3P or PH3 are used, then size dispersion is improved, but toxicity and production cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize dispersionVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameters of the phosphorous precursor from highly reactive compounds like (TMS)3P or PH3 to less reactive but non-toxic alternatives such as TOP (trioctylphosphine) or PCl3, maintaining adequate size dispersion while eliminating toxicity issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs inexpensive phosphorous precursors that can be used in standard industrial settings without requiring special safety infrastructure, effectively replacing expensive and hazardous materials with economical alternatives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Manufacturing precision

If highly reactive phosphorous precursors like (TMS)3P are used, then size dispersion is improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize dispersionVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes expensive precursors like (TMS)3P with inexpensive alternatives such as TOP or PCl3, achieving comparable size dispersion results without the high material costs that would hinder industrial-scale production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Manufacturing precision

If PH3-based synthesis is used, then size dispersion is improved, but toxicity and handling difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize dispersionVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful properties of PH3 by replacing it with precursors like TOP or PCl3 that offer similar or adequate size dispersion control without the extreme toxicity, transforming a hazardous process into a safe industrial operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary phosphorous compounds such as TOP or PCl3 that serve as safe mediators between the desired size dispersion outcome and the elimination of toxic PH3 handling requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If low reactivity phosphorous precursors are used, then toxicity is reduced, but size dispersion deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetoxicityVSAvoidsize dispersion
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the reactivity parameters of low-toxicity precursors like TOP or PCl3 by adjusting reaction conditions such as temperature, solvent composition, and addition rate, achieving satisfactory size dispersion despite the inherent low reactivity of these safe precursors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the efficient and cost-effective production of InP or InAs nanocrystals with low size dispersity and high chemical yield, reducing synthesis costs by up to 66% and allowing for scalable, cadmium-free production of luminescent materials with precise size control.

Implementation Method 1

When heating the solution, the decomposed precursors form monomers that nucleate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 2

When heating the solution, the decomposed precursors form monomers that nucleate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS10532403B2Size-tunable nanoparticle synthesis
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 QUSTOMDOT BV
  • US10532403B2 patent drawing
  • US10532403B2 patent drawing
  • US10532403B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for synthesizing nanoparticles with a predetermined size at high or full yield comprises mixing a first precursor material comprising a first compound comprising a halide moiety and a metal or a metalloid, a second precursor material comprising a second compound comprising a polyatomic nonmetal, and a solvent. The method further comprises heating the mixture to colloidally form nanoparticles comprising the polyatomic nonmetal and the metal or metalloid. The halide moiety is selected such as to colloidally form the nanoparticles in a predetermined size range that is at least partially determined by this halide moiety.