Skate Blade Alignment Using Optical Measurement in Sharpening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing skate sharpening systems rely heavily on manual alignment methods, which are tedious, imprecise, and prone to user error, leading to uneven blade edges due to misalignment of the grinding wheel and skate blade centers, affecting skate performance.

Innovation Solution

Implement automated alignment systems using measurement devices such as imaging devices and lasers to determine the precise alignment of the grinding wheel relative to the skate blade, reducing reliance on human vision and improving precision and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual alignment methods are used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the manufacturing precision and measurement precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidalignment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical alignment methods with an automated optical measurement system. The system uses imaging devices to capture images of alignment features on the skate blade and grinding wheel, then uses image processing and computational algorithms to determine alignment. This substitution of mechanical/manual operations with optical and computational methods directly resolves the contradiction by improving precision while accepting increased system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates optical copies (images) of the physical alignment features on the skate blade and grinding wheel. By capturing images of these features and analyzing them computationally, the system can measure alignment with high precision without requiring direct physical contact or complex mechanical measurement tools. This copying approach enables precise measurement while using relatively simple imaging hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If manual alignment methods are used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability deteriorates due to user error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment accuracyVSAvoidalignment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates human operators from the alignment process by replacing manual visual assessment with automated optical imaging and computational analysis. The system objectively measures alignment based on captured images and calculated positions, removing subjectivity and user error from the process. This automation improves reliability while requiring a more complex automated system instead of simple manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The alignment system is self-calibrating and self-measuring. It automatically captures images, processes them to identify alignment features, calculates positions, and determines alignment status without human intervention. The system serves itself by performing all measurement and analysis functions autonomously, which improves consistency and reliability while increasing automation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If automated measurement devices are used, then the measurement precision is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment measurement precisionVSAvoidalignment operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple manual alignment operations with an automated optical measurement and calculation system. While the physical operation becomes more complex due to imaging and computation, the system eliminates the need for skilled manual alignment techniques and provides automated results. The complexity is shifted from human skill to automated hardware and software, improving precision while changing the nature of operation rather than simply making it easier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The automated alignment systems enhance the precision and consistency of skate blade sharpening, ensuring even edges and minimizing the time required for setup, thereby improving skate performance and reducing user error.

Implementation Method 1

using measurement devices such as imaging devices and lasers to determine the precise alignment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

using measurement devices such as imaging devices and lasers to determine the precise alignment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS20250387874A1Devices, systems, and methods for skate blade alignment in a skate sharpening system
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 VELASA SPORTS
  • US20250387874A1 patent drawing
  • US20250387874A1 patent drawing
  • US20250387874A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An alignment system configured for use in a skate sharpening system (200) can comprise: a securing component (202) configured to secure a skate blade (100) within a skate sharpening system (200); an alignment component (600) positioned within a housing of the skate sharpening system (200); a control system configured to control operation of the skate sharpening system (200); and at least one measurement device (400) configured to perform at least one measurement of at least one of component of the skate sharpening system (200).