Skew Roller No-Back Brake Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional no-back brake mechanisms face issues due to non-ideal coefficients of friction and wear, as well as manufacturing challenges with ratchet wheels and pawls, leading to inconsistent braking performance.

Innovation Solution

A no-back brake mechanism featuring a rotating plate and rollers with optional stop means, allowing the mechanism to function as a low-friction thrust bearing in one direction and a skewed roller system in the opposite direction, eliminating the need for complex ratchets and pawls.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional ratchet wheels and pawls are used, then no-back braking function is achieved, but manufacturing complexity and tolerance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveno-back braking functionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional ratchet and pawl mechanical system with a skew roller mechanism. The skew rollers, positioned at a specific angle to the rotation direction, provide the no-back braking function through their geometric configuration rather than through interlocking teeth and levers, thereby simplifying manufacturing and reducing tolerance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the braking mechanism by using skew rollers at a specific angle rather than conventional radial rollers. This parameter change (skew angle) enables the no-back function while allowing for more relaxed manufacturing tolerances and simpler fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional carbon disks are used, then braking surface is provided, but friction coefficient dispersion and surface polishing effects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking consistencyVSAvoidfriction coefficient uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite braking system combining skew rollers with a brake ring or carbon disk. This composite structure allows the friction surfaces to be optimized separately, with the skew rollers providing mechanical advantage and the brake ring providing consistent friction, thereby reducing overall friction coefficient dispersion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes part of the friction-based braking mechanism with a mechanical skew roller system that provides more consistent and predictable braking force, reducing reliance on friction coefficient uniformity alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If skew angle is fixed for desired braking effect, then no-back function is achieved, but adaptability to different conditions decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking effectVSAvoidadjustability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces adjustability to the skew roller mechanism, allowing the skew angle or roller position to be modified. This dynamic capability enables the mechanism to adapt to different loading conditions and application requirements while maintaining reliable no-back braking function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs the skew roller mechanism to serve multiple functions: providing no-back braking at a fixed skew angle while also allowing adjustment for different conditions. This multi-functionality increases versatility without compromising the primary braking effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design provides consistent and adjustable braking performance with reduced torque friction in one direction and energy absorption in the other, enhancing reliability and simplicity compared to conventional mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

The skew angles are set and fixed for the desired coefficient of friction and braking effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3324065B1No-back mechanism
Publication Date: 2020.08.12 RATIER FIGEAC SAS
  • EP3324065B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3324065B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3324065B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A no-back brake mechanism or a torque limiter mechanism, comprising a plurality of rollers each mounted within a respective roller cage, the roller cages being articulated about an axis such that rotation of the rollers in a first direction causes no movement of the cages about their axis and rotation of the rollers in a second direction opposite the first direction causes the cages to rotate with respect to their axis.