Skew-Tolerant Reader Set Selection in Array-Reader Magnetic Recording

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current magnetic recording technologies like BPMR and HAMR increase costs due to modifications required for media and heads, while TDMR relies on complex signal processing, necessitating a cost-effective approach to enhance areal density.

Innovation Solution

The proposed method for an ARMR system involves obtaining cross-track separation information to determine optimal reader combinations for enhanced read performance across various skew angles, allowing for improved skew tolerance without increasing the number of components or computational overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If BPMR or HAMR is used to increase recording density, then areal density is improved, but manufacturing cost increases due to modifications required for media and heads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveareal densityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by using conventional media and a standard read/write head that can function in both traditional single-reader modes and ARMR modes. The same hardware infrastructure supports multiple recording methodologies, eliminating the need for specialized BPMR or HAMR modifications while achieving enhanced areal density through software-controlled reader array operations and signal processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Quantity of substance

If TDMR is used to achieve one bit-per-grain recording density, then areal density is improved, but device complexity increases due to powerful signal processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveareal densityVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the reading function across multiple readers (reader array) that read from different tracks simultaneously. Each reader processes a portion of the data, and the signals are combined through relatively simple interference cancellation algorithms. This distributes the processing burden across multiple simple components rather than requiring one complex processor, reducing overall device complexity while achieving high areal density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by having each reader in the array read from a specific track with a known pattern, and only combining the necessary portions of these readings through signal processing. The system processes exactly the amount of data needed from each reader without unnecessary computation, achieving efficient signal combination with reduced complexity compared to processing all possible reader outputs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If a fixed reader combination is used in ARMR, then device complexity is reduced, but read performance deteriorates due to skew angle variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereader selection complexityVSAvoidread performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the reader combination selection adaptive rather than fixed. The system dynamically determines which readers to use based on the actual skew angle detected during operation. This allows the reader array to optimize its configuration in real-time according to mechanical variations, maintaining high read performance without requiring overly complex pre-programmed selection logic for every possible skew condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If reader combinations are optimized for each skew angle, then read performance is improved, but device complexity increases due to selection overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveread performanceVSAvoidreader selection overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-determining and storing optimal reader combinations for various skew angle ranges before actual data reading occurs. During operation, the system simply looks up the appropriate pre-computed reader set based on the detected skew angle, rather than performing complex optimization calculations in real-time. This prepares the system in advance, achieving high read performance with minimal selection overhead during actual data access

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9093119B1Skew-tolerant reader set selection in array-reader based magnetic recording
Publication Date: 2015.07.28 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US9093119B1 patent drawing
  • US9093119B1 patent drawing
  • US9093119B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for enhancing read performance in an ARMR system includes: obtaining CTS information for a plurality of readers in a multi-reader head of the ARMR system, the CTS information defining a relationship between skew angle and CTS between respective combinations of subsets of the readers; determining, as a function of the CTS information, a given one of the combinations of subsets of the readers which provides enhanced read performance among a total number of combinations of subsets of the readers for each of a plurality of skew angles; and selecting, for subsequent processing by a read channel in the ARMR system, the given one of the combinations of subsets of the readers determined to provide enhanced read performance for a given one of the skew angles corresponding to a zone in which the multi-reader head is operating.