Cross-Country Ski Binding Elevation for Oscillation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cross-country ski bindings with multiple elastic flexors are complex, costly to manufacture, and prone to material fatigue, leading to oscillation issues during skating that disrupt forward movement.

Innovation Solution

A cross-country ski binding with an unyielding base body and an elastically deformable reset element, featuring an elevation behind the pivot axis to control the ski boot's position and limit oscillation, eliminating the need for a rear flexor and simplifying the design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If multiple elastic flexors are used in the cross-country ski binding, then the oscillating movement of the ski is limited, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoscillation controlVSAvoidbinding structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the rear flexor from the binding structure, keeping only the front flexor. The elevation behind the pivot axis compensates for the removed rear flexor by limiting the boot's upward pivot, thereby simplifying the structure while maintaining oscillation control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an elevation at a specific location (behind the pivot axis) with specific properties (unyielding, height of 0.3-1.5mm) to perform the function previously distributed to multiple flexors. This localized structural modification achieves oscillation control without adding overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If multiple elastic flexors are used in the cross-country ski binding, then the oscillating movement is limited, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoscillation controlVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the rear flexor component entirely and replacing its function with a simple elevation integrated into the binding base body, the patent reduces the number of parts that need to be manufactured and assembled, thereby lowering manufacturing costs while maintaining oscillation control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The elevation is integrated directly into the binding base body structure, merging two previously separate functions (base body support and oscillation limitation) into a single unified component, which simplifies manufacturing and reduces costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Stability of the object's composition

If a rear flexor is used in the cross-country ski binding, then the oscillating movement is limited, but material fatigue occurs leading to impaired function

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoscillation controlVSAvoidmaterial durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the rear flexor, an elastic component prone to material fatigue, and replaces it with an unyielding elevation that does not undergo repeated elastic deformation. This eliminates the fatigue problem while maintaining the oscillation control function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using an elastic element (flexor) to limit oscillation, the patent uses a rigid elevation that mechanically stops the boot's upward pivot. This inverts the approach from elastic deformation-based control to rigid geometric constraint, improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of manufacture

If the cross-country ski binding is simplified by removing the rear flexor, then manufacturing cost decreases, but oscillation control may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidoscillation control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The elevation is designed with specific local properties (height of 0.3-1.5mm, unyielding material) at the critical location behind the pivot axis to compensate for the removed rear flexor. This localized precision engineering ensures oscillation control is maintained despite the overall simplification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of the binding structure by introducing an elevation with specific height dimensions (0.3-1.5mm) and material properties (unyielding). This parameter modification allows the single front flexor system to achieve the same oscillation control as the previous dual-flexor system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively limits oscillation, reduces material fatigue, and ensures consistent function over extended use without the need for frequent replacements, while maintaining cost-effectiveness and stability.

Implementation Method 1

an elastically deformable resetting element for resetting the cross-country ski boot from an upwardly pivoted position in the direction of the standing surface of the binding base body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

at least one essentially unyielding elevation is provided behind the pivot axis on the standing surface of the binding base body, with which elevation the sole of the cross-country ski boot is arranged in its unloaded state at a distance from the standing surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGeometric constraint: Geometry

Data Source

PatentUS11364430B2Cross-country skiing kit with a cross-country ski binding and with a cross-country ski boot
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 FISCHER SPORTS GMBH
  • US11364430B2 patent drawing
  • US11364430B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cross-country skiing kit with a cross-country ski binding and with a cross-country ski boot, wherein the crosscountry ski binding, for articulated connection of a cross-country ski boot to a cross-country ski, is provided with a substantially unyielding binding main body which has a stand surface for a sole of the cross-country ski boot, with a holder device which has a seat for pivotable arrangement of the cross-country ski boot about a pivot axis extending in the transverse direction of the binding main body, with an elastically deformable resetting element for resetting the cross-country ski boot from an upwardly pivoted position in the direction of the stand surface of the binding main body, wherein at least one substantially unyielding elevation is provided on the stand surface of the binding main body, to the rear of the pivot axis in the longitudinal direction of the binding main body, with which elevation the sole of the cross-country ski boot in its unloaded state is arranged at a distance from the stand surface of the binding main body.