Ski Binding Heelpiece Tongue Material Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing heel pieces for sports shoes on gliding boards face issues such as inadequate tongue support, non-ideal coefficient of friction, and rapid wear, leading to difficulties in putting on and releasing the shoe, as well as compatibility problems with various footwear types.

Innovation Solution

A heel piece design featuring a movable heel grip with a separate, adjustable tongue formed from a different material, allowing for optimized material selection for durability and friction, and a modular tongue that can be customized in shape and size for better fit and longevity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the tongue is made from the same rigid plastic material as the heel grip through injection molding, then the manufacturing is simple and inexpensive, but the tongue exhibits rapid wear and has non-optimal friction coefficient for release phases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtongue durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tongue is separated from the heel grip assembly and made as a distinct replaceable component. This allows the tongue to be manufactured from materials optimized for its specific functions (wear resistance and friction control) while the heel grip can be made from rigid plastic for structural integrity. The segmentation enables independent material optimization and replacement of the tongue when worn.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs different materials for the tongue and heel grip to optimize performance. The tongue can be made from materials with superior wear resistance and controlled friction coefficients (such as polyethylene or other polymers), while the heel grip maintains its rigid plastic construction for structural strength. This composite material approach resolves the contradiction between ease of manufacture and tongue reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If the tongue has a fixed dimension from injection molding, then the manufacturing is straightforward, but the tongue is too short or thin for adequate shoe support and compatibility with various footwear types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing straightforwardnessVSAvoidfootwear compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The tongue is designed as a dynamic, adjustable component rather than a fixed-dimension part. It can be extended or modified in length and thickness to accommodate different footwear types (hiking boots, alpine ski boots, junior boots). The adjustable nature allows the same heel piece to adapt to various shoe configurations while maintaining straightforward manufacturing of the base component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The tongue is designed as a universal, interchangeable component that can serve multiple footwear types. By making the tongue adjustable and replaceable, a single heel grip assembly can accommodate various boot styles and sizes. The tongue's dimensions can be modified or replaced to match different footwear requirements, providing universal compatibility without complicating the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If the tongue shape is constrained by injection process requirements, then the manufacturing is simple, but the tongue cannot provide sufficient support surface area for proper shoe fitting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtongue support surface area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the tongue from the injection-molded heel grip, the tongue can be manufactured using processes better suited for creating large, flat support surfaces. The tongue can be made as a separate component with optimized geometry for maximum contact area with the shoe, while the heel grip itself remains simple to manufacture through injection molding. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific manufacturing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates easier fitting and release of the shoe while providing improved durability and adaptability to different footwear types, reducing wear and enhancing user experience.

Implementation Method 1

whose coefficient of friction is not ideal for the tripping function

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP2578277B1Heelpiece of a safety binding for ski boot
Publication Date: 2016.03.02 SKIS ROSSIGNOL SA VOIRON FR
  • EP2578277B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2578277B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2578277B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

The heelpiece has a heel grip (10) secured to a tubular movable body (11) pivoting about a hinge axis (14), and a tongue provided in a lower anterior part of the grip. A rear part of a sole of a sports boot is rested on the anterior part. Entire/small portion of the tongue is formed by a separate part (3) of the grip. The tongue has a base (22) and a top layer (2) superposed at the base and pertaining to the part from the base. The entire/small portion of the separate part of the heel grip is made of a material different from that of the mobile body and/or the heel grip and/or the base. An independent claim is also included for a device for binding a ski boot on a ski.