Ski Binding Climbing Wedge Segmentation for Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ski binding retainer systems for ski touring are prone to failure when the actuating lever breaks, and the lever is not optimally designed for both heel blocking and climbing wedge functions, leading to inefficiencies and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

The design separates the climbing wedge from the actuating lever, allowing the system to remain functional for descending even if the wedge breaks, and incorporates a mechanism with a cam and spring to hold the wedges in stable positions, enabling efficient adaptation for both downhill and uphill skiing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the climbing wedge is integrated into the actuating lever, then the structure is simpler, but the reliability decreases because breakage of the wedge causes complete failure of the fastener

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidfastener reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The climbing wedge is separated from the actuating lever into an independent replaceable component. This segmentation allows the wedge to be replaced if broken, while the actuating lever remains functional, thus resolving the reliability issue without significantly increasing overall structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The climbing wedge is designed as a consumable part that can be discarded when broken and recovered/replaced independently. This allows the main actuating lever mechanism to be preserved and continue functioning for heel blocking, eliminating the complete failure mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Device complexity

If the actuating lever is used for both heel blocking and climbing wedge functions, then the device is more compact, but the ease of operation decreases because the lever is not optimal for both functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice compactnessVSAvoidhandling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the climbing wedge from the actuating lever, each component can be optimized for its specific function. The actuating lever is optimized for heel blocking operations, while the climbing wedge is optimized for climbing operations, significantly improving ease of operation for both functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each component is designed with local qualities optimized for its specific function. The actuating lever has properties optimized for blocking, while the climbing wedge has properties optimized for climbing, allowing both to perform their respective functions efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If a single jaw structure is used for both blocking and climbing, then the device is simpler, but the adaptability decreases because it cannot be optimally adapted to different functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidfunctional adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The climbing wedge is segmented as a separate component that can be independently configured and optimized for different climbing conditions, while the jaw structure remains simple for blocking functions. This provides adaptability for various climbing scenarios without complicating the basic blocking mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves multi-functionality through the combination of a simple blocking jaw and a separate climbing wedge that can be configured for different climbing needs. The separate wedge provides adaptability for various climbing conditions while the jaw handles blocking, creating a universal solution for both downhill and uphill skiing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the reliability and safety of the ski binding by allowing continued use of the actuating lever for descending and optimizes the wedges' functionality for different skiing conditions, ensuring secure attachment and easy handling.

Implementation Method 1

a spring in an unfolded state, in which the spring bears against the blocking element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The first climbing wedge pivots around a transverse tilting axis, distinct from the transverse axis of rotation of the jaw

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Data Source

PatentEP2724760B1Retaining device for a ski binding with separated climbing wedges
Publication Date: 2017.08.16 SALOMON SA
  • EP2724760B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2724760B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2724760B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The device has a jaw (20) for holding a heel of a ski shoe, where the jaw pivots about a rotation axis (A) provided transverse to a gliding device. The jaw is arranged with an actuation lever (30). A heel lift wedge (41) is able to switch between an operative position (PA1) in which the wedge rests on the jaw to form a lower stop, and a passive position in which the wedge does not interfere with vertical movement of the heel. The wedge is arranged separate from the actuation lever. An independent claim is also included for a shoe fastener.