Skid Steer Floor Grinding System with Rotating Beam

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional floor grinders are limited in size due to their 'push-behind' design, leading to reduced usable cutting area and increased labor intensity for large area grinding and polishing tasks.

Innovation Solution

A motor-driven grinding wheel assembly attached to a rotating beam that moves in a circular motion, allowing for a larger polishing area and effective flattening and polishing of floors, with adjustable legs and swiveling caster wheels for improved maneuverability and counterbalances for load balancing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional floor grinders use a push-behind design with a round disk containing radial array of cutting disks, then the device is easy to maneuver manually, but the usable cutting area is reduced and labor intensity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual maneuverabilityVSAvoidusable cutting area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The floor grinder is divided into multiple independent cutting heads (first, second, third, and fourth cutting heads) arranged around a central axis. Each cutting head can be independently positioned and adjusted, allowing the system to process large floor areas simultaneously while maintaining manageable device size through modular segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from a two-dimensional cutting surface (conventional round disk) to a three-dimensional arrangement of cutting heads positioned at different radial distances and angular positions around a central axis. This spatial distribution dramatically increases the total usable cutting area while keeping each individual cutting head within manageable size limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If conventional floor grinders use a push-behind design, then the device structure is simple, but the labor intensity increases for large area grinding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple cutting heads are merged into a single integrated system that operates simultaneously on different sections of the floor. The first and second cutting heads are positioned on one side of the central axis while the third and fourth cutting heads are on the opposite side, creating a balanced configuration that processes large areas in one pass, thereby reducing overall labor intensity despite increased device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Each cutting head is equipped with adjustable legs and swiveling caster wheels, allowing the same structural components to serve multiple functions: supporting the cutting head, enabling height adjustment, and providing maneuverability. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate adjustment mechanisms for each cutting head, managing device complexity while enhancing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Area of stationary object

If floor processing system uses multiple cutting heads at different radial positions, then the processing area is expanded, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing areaVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting heads are positioned asymmetrically relative to the central axis, with the first and second cutting heads at a first radial distance on one side, and the third and fourth cutting heads at a second radial distance on the opposite side. This asymmetric arrangement maximizes the processing area coverage while maintaining structural balance and managing complexity through non-uniform distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The device incorporates counterbalances to offset the weight distribution created by having multiple cutting heads at different radial positions. The counterbalances compensate for the asymmetric mass distribution, maintaining device stability and ease of maneuverability despite the expanded processing area and increased structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables efficient processing of large areas with reduced labor intensity by providing a wide sweeping motion and simultaneous axial and radial processing capabilities, overcoming the limitations of conventional floor grinders.

Implementation Method 1

a motor driven, grinding wheel assembly which attaches to the end of a rotating beam which is also motor driven. The rotating beam moves the grinding wheel assembly in a circular motion providing for a large polishing area during operation.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCircular motion:

Implementation Method 2

All concrete grinders use some sort of abrasive to grind or polish such as diamond tools or Silicon carbide. The cutting tools used for grinding most commonly are diamond grinding cup wheels, and for polishing are usually diamond polishing pads.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS9744637B1Floor processing system
Publication Date: 2017.08.29 LAWHON CHARLES
  • US9744637B1 patent drawing
  • US9744637B1 patent drawing
  • US9744637B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A floor processing system for a skid steer loader includes a shroud having an attachment device configured to removably engage with the skid steer loader; a central motor secured to the shroud and rotatably attached to an arm; a first rotary assembly secured to the arm; and a second rotary assembly secured to the arm. The first rotary assembly includes a first disc rotatably attached to a first motor via a first shaft; and a plurality of first cutters extending from the first disc. The second rotary assembly secured to the arm includes a second disc rotatably attached to a second motor via a second shaft; and a plurality of second cutters extending from the second disc.