Automated Non-Technical Skill Assessment Using Odd-Scale Questionnaires

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining non-technical skills, such as multiple-choice questionnaires, are prone to bias and do not accurately capture the interdependencies between skills, leading to unreliable and incomplete results.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a multiple-choice questionnaire with odd scales that allows for neutral responses, coupled with automated determination of skill values and correction mechanisms based on value thresholds and conditions, to provide reliable and precise assessments of non-technical skills without expert intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If multiple-choice questionnaires are used to determine non-technical skills, then the process can be automated, but the results are prone to bias and do not accurately capture interdependencies between skills

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of skill assessment processVSAvoidaccuracy of skill determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the assessment from simple multiple-choice responses to a structured questionnaire with specific response formats (odd scales with neutral options). This parameter change in the measurement scale allows for more nuanced data collection that captures interdependencies between skills while remaining suitable for automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automated feedback mechanisms where the system processes questionnaire responses and generates skill assessments without human intervention. This feedback loop maintains automation while improving precision through systematic analysis of responses against predefined criteria and interdependency rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If expert intervention is used to correct biases and account for interdependencies, then measurement precision improves, but the extent of automation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of skill determinationVSAvoidautomation of skill assessment process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the assessment system to self-correct biases and account for interdependencies through automated algorithms. The system independently processes questionnaire data, applies correction rules for interdependencies, and generates final assessments without requiring expert intervention, thus maintaining full automation while improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an automated intermediary processing layer between the questionnaire and final results. This intermediary systematically applies correction rules and accounts for skill interdependencies through algorithmic processing, replacing the need for human experts while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If standard multiple-choice questionnaires are used, then ease of operation is high, but reliability of results deteriorates due to bias and inability to capture skill interdependencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of administering assessmentVSAvoidreliability of skill assessment results
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the questionnaire parameters to use odd scales with neutral response options instead of standard even-scale multiple-choice. This parameter change maintains ease of operation while significantly improving reliability by reducing response bias and enabling capture of nuanced skill interdependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic processing of questionnaire responses where the system automatically adjusts for interdependencies between skills based on response patterns. This dynamic approach maintains operational simplicity while improving reliability through systematic correction of biases and accounting for skill relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4560551A1Method for determining non-technical skills of a computer-implemented subject, program product for carrying out such a method and recording medium storing such a program
Publication Date: 2025.05.28 ADKS
  • EP4560551A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4560551A1 patent drawing
  • EP4560551A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a computer-implemented method for determining non-technical skills of a subject, said technical skills being able to be qualified from values ​​of characteristics of the subject. The determination method comprising the following steps: submitting the subject to a multiple-choice questionnaire comprising a plurality of questions each relating to at least one of the characteristics of the subject, and automated determination, from answers given by the subject to the questions, of the values ​​of the characteristics of the subject. The multiple choices of each question are based on odd scales, and during the automated determination step, a value threshold and a condition relating to said value threshold are provided for at least one characteristic of the subject, such that when said characteristic of the subject meets the condition relating to said threshold, a correction is applied to at least one other characteristic of the subject.