Aircraft Skin Panel Free-State Machining for Nominal Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing methods for aircraft skin panels are inefficient, leading to increased costs, time-consuming machining setups, and non-nominal aerodynamic profiles due to variations and tolerances introduced by holding fixtures and machining processes.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a holding fixture that supports the panel assembly in a free state, allowing for scanning of the outer surface contour, development of a numerically controlled machining program, and machining of sacrificial material at interface locations to achieve nominal thicknesses, thereby reducing the need for shimming and ensuring accurate aerodynamic profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional holding fixtures are used to support skin panels during machining, then the panels can be held stable for machining operations, but tolerances and variations are introduced resulting in gaps that require shimming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel thickness toleranceVSAvoidholding fixture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the holding fixture entirely from the machining process. Instead of using a fixture to hold the panel during machining, the panel is supported in its natural free-state position, eliminating the source of tolerance introduction while maintaining machining capability through direct support on the mandrel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a compensating mechanism that measures the actual panel geometry and calculates precise cutter paths to compensate for any variations. This intermediary measurement and calculation system replaces the need for rigid fixture-based tolerance control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If skin panels are machined after ladder assembly completion, then accurate interface fit can be achieved, but significant holding costs are incurred due to waiting time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface fit accuracyVSAvoidpanel waiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs machining operations on skin panels before they are assembled to the ladder structure. By preparing the panels in advance while they are still accessible and supported independently, the process eliminates waiting time while maintaining interface accuracy through the free-state machining approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple machining operations are performed on skin panels, then accurate interface locations are achieved, but time-consuming and costly machining setups are required each time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterface location accuracyVSAvoidmachining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple machining operations into a single continuous process. By supporting the panel in its free state and using compensating cutter paths, all necessary machining can be performed in one setup without repeated fixture changes or repositioning, dramatically improving productivity while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Stability of the object's composition

If holding fixtures are used to support panel assembly, then the assembly can be stabilized during machining, but the geometric shape deviates from the as-designed nominal state

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel assembly stabilityVSAvoidpanel assembly geometric shape
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the holding fixture that causes geometric distortion and instead supports the panel assembly directly on the mandrel in its natural free state. This eliminates the shape deviation while maintaining stability through the inherent support structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the actual free-state geometry of the panel is measured and used to generate compensating cutter paths. This feedback loop allows the system to adapt to the natural geometric variations and achieve accurate machining without rigid fixture constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4227748B1Method of manufacturing an assembly having a nominal thickness skin panel
Publication Date: 2025.02.12 THE BOEING CO
  • EP4227748B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4227748B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4227748B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a panel assembly (266) includes supporting the panel assembly (266) in a free state (280) using a holding fixture (350). The panel assembly (266) has a skin panel (300), and sacrificial material (322) coupled to a skin panel inner surface (302). The method includes acquiring a free state outer surface contour (372) of the panel assembly (266) by scanning a skin panel outer surface (304) while the panel assembly (266) is supported by the holding fixture (350). The method also includes developing a numerically controlled (NC) machining program (388) having cutter paths (402) configured for machining the interface locations (320) to an inner surface contour (382) that reflects nominal thicknesses (306) of the panel assembly (266) based off of the free state outer surface contour (372). In addition, the method includes machining the sacrificial material (322) at the interface locations (320) by moving a cutter (400) along the cutter paths (402) while the panel assembly (266) is supported by the holding fixture (350).