Skip Fire Engine Control for Power Take-Off Torque Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Utility vehicles with power take-off implements often operate at idle or low torque levels, leading to poor fuel efficiency and emissions characteristics, and present challenges in determining when to implement skip fire engine control effectively.

Innovation Solution

Engine controllers that detect the engagement or disengagement of power take-off units and adjust engine operation modes between skip fire and all cylinder modes based on torque requests, emissions levels, and exhaust gas temperatures to optimize fuel efficiency and emissions management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the engine operates at idle or low torque levels with power take-off implements, then the implement can be used while the vehicle is stopped or moving slowly, but fuel efficiency and emissions characteristics deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplement operation capabilityVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The engine dynamically transitions between skip fire mode and all-cylinder mode based on real-time detection of PTO engagement status and torque requests. The controller monitors trigger actions (clutch engagement, control stick movement, throttle actuation) and adjusts the firing fraction accordingly, allowing the engine to adapt its operation to match actual power demands while maintaining implement operability during stopped or slow vehicle conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the engine operates at idle or low torque levels with power take-off implements, then the implement can be used while the vehicle is stopped or moving slowly, but emissions characteristics deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplement operation capabilityVSAvoidpollutant emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The engine dynamically transitions between skip fire mode and all-cylinder mode based on real-time detection of PTO engagement status and torque requests. The controller monitors trigger actions (clutch engagement, control stick movement, throttle actuation) and adjusts the firing fraction accordingly, allowing the engine to adapt its operation to match actual power demands while maintaining implement operability during stopped or slow vehicle conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The engine control system changes operational parameters by transitioning between different firing fractions (skip fire vs. all-cylinder modes). This parameter change optimizes the balance between maintaining implement operability and reducing emissions, allowing the engine to operate more efficiently during low-load conditions while still providing necessary power when the PTO is engaged

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If the engine transitions out of skip fire mode when PTO is engaged and torque request exceeds threshold, then fuel efficiency improves, but response time to provide required power may be delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidpower response speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously monitors PTO engagement status through multiple trigger actions (clutch position, control stick position, throttle position) and real-time torque requests. This feedback mechanism allows the engine to detect when PTO engagement occurs and when torque demands exceed the skip fire threshold, enabling timely transitions from skip fire to all-cylinder mode to ensure adequate power response while maintaining fuel efficiency during appropriate operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Use of energy by moving object

If the engine transitions to skip fire mode when PTO is disengaged and torque request is below threshold, then fuel efficiency improves, but exhaust gas temperature may drop below optimal levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidexhaust gas temperature
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The engine control system changes operational parameters by transitioning between different firing fractions (skip fire vs. all-cylinder modes). This parameter change optimizes the balance between maintaining implement operability and reducing emissions, allowing the engine to operate more efficiently during low-load conditions while still providing necessary power when the PTO is engaged

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11724594B2Using skip fire with power take-off
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 CUMMINS INC
  • US11724594B2 patent drawing
  • US11724594B2 patent drawing
  • US11724594B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Engine controllers and control schemes that facilitate skip fire engine operation in conjunction with use power take-off devices are described. In one aspect, a skip fire mode is exited when the power take-off unit is engaged and the current torque request exceeds a torque threshold. In some embodiments, the exit is delayed when the temperature of an after treatment system is below a designated temperature threshold. In another aspect, the engine transitions to the skip fire mode when the power take-off unit disengages. In some embodiments, exiting is conditioned on the current torque request being less than a torque threshold. In some embodiments, the transition is made immediately, whereas in others the transition only occurs when the power take-off unit is not reengaged for a period of time or is further conditioned on determining that the power take-off unit is likely to remain disengaged for the period of time.