SKU Differentiation via Pixel-to-Physical Dimension Ratios

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image recognition techniques fail to distinguish between products that have similar appearances but vary in size, making it difficult to enforce planograms and manage inventory effectively in retail environments.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that uses an image recognition application to identify products, generate regions of interest, determine pixel and physical dimensions, calculate pixel-to-physical dimension ratios, and assign stock keeping unit identifiers based on these ratios, allowing for accurate differentiation of products with similar packaging but varying sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing image recognition techniques are used to identify products, then product identification can be performed, but products with similar appearances but different sizes cannot be distinguished

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct size differentiation accuracyVSAvoidproduct identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional image recognition to three-dimensional measurement by incorporating depth information through time-of-flight sensing. This allows the system to distinguish between products of similar appearance but different sizes by measuring their actual physical dimensions in addition to visual characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the measurement parameters from purely visual (2D) to include physical dimensions (3D). By adding depth measurement capability through time-of-flight sensors, the system can detect and differentiate products based on their actual size parameters, resolving the limitation of traditional image recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If manual tracking of product location and quantity is performed, then inventory can be monitored, but the process is labor-intensive and difficult to enforce planograms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory auditing speedVSAvoidinventory management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service inventory auditing by automatically capturing images and depth data, identifying products, measuring their dimensions, and comparing them against planogram requirements without human intervention. This eliminates the labor-intensive manual tracking process while maintaining accurate inventory monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inventory tracking with an automated optical and computational system. Image capture devices and depth sensors substitute for human eyes and hands, while image processing algorithms replace the cognitive and decision-making processes involved in manual planogram enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If image recognition is used without physical dimension measurement, then product identification is faster, but size variation among similar products cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct size measurement accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces depth data as an intermediary measurement layer between the image capture device and the product identification system. This intermediary depth information serves as a bridge that enables size differentiation without requiring direct physical contact or complex measurement apparatus, simply by processing additional optical data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10318837B2Distinguishing between stock keeping units using a physical dimension of a region depicted in an image
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 RICOH CO LTD
  • US10318837B2 patent drawing
  • US10318837B2 patent drawing
  • US10318837B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure includes a system and method for distinguishing between stock keeping units of similar appearance that vary in size. An image recognition application receives an image including a shelving unit stocking a plurality of items, identifies each item in the image, generates a region of interest for each identified item in the image, identifies a physical dimension of a portion of region depicted in the image, determines a dimension of the region of interest for each identified item and the portion of region in pixels, determines a pixel-to-physical dimension ratio using the dimension in pixels of the portion of region and the physical dimension of the portion of region depicted in the image, and determines a stock keeping unit identifier of each identified item in the image based on the pixel-to-physical dimension ratio and the dimension of the region of interest for each identified item.