Skylight Safety Net Between Shells for Fall Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing skylights lack effective and durable solutions for preventing falls through the dome, as previous safety measures either obstruct light transmission, require significant space, or are prone to embrittlement, and existing solutions are costly and complex to install.

Innovation Solution

A skylight design featuring a deformable safety net integrated between two shells, anchored by a frame with spaced-apart receptacles, allowing controlled deformation to distribute dynamic loads and prevent falls without additional space or light obstruction, using a durable and corrosion-resistant mesh.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If external safety devices such as grids or bars are arranged above or below the skylight dome, then fall protection is provided, but the devices take up significant space, reduce light transmission, and complicate installation and maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall protectionVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety net is nested within the skylight dome structure itself, specifically in the space between the upper and lower shells. This internal placement eliminates the need for external safety devices, freeing up space around the dome while maintaining fall protection functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of placing safety devices in the vertical space above or below the dome, the solution moves the safety function into the horizontal dimension by utilizing the inter-shell space. This dimensional shift allows fall protection without compromising external space or light transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If thick polycarbonate panes are used below the bottom shell to prevent falls, then fall protection is achieved, but light transmission is significantly reduced and the structure becomes more expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall protectionVSAvoidlight transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

A flexible safety net made of thin material is used instead of thick rigid polycarbonate panes. This thin film approach provides fall protection while maintaining light transmission, as the net is sufficiently transparent to allow light passage while being strong enough to prevent falls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

3Reliability

If permanent external safety devices are installed, then fall protection is provided, but the devices are exposed to weather, require frequent checking and replacement, and increase costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall protectionVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The safety net is merged with the skylight dome structure by integrating it between the upper and lower shells. This combination means the safety device shares the same service life and durability characteristics as the dome itself, eliminating the need for separate weather-resistant construction and maintenance cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated safety net benefits from the self-protective qualities of the dome structure. Since the net is protected within the enclosed space between shells, it is shielded from direct weather exposure, reducing degradation and extending service life without requiring additional protective measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If safety devices are arranged externally, then fall protection is provided, but ventilation and fire smoke devices cannot be installed or operated properly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall protectionVSAvoidventilation device installation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By relocating the safety function to the inter-shell space, the external dimensions and operational clearance around the dome are freed up. This allows ventilation and fire smoke devices to be installed and operated without interference from safety structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides reliable and long-lasting fall protection without obstructing light or ventilation, is easy to upgrade, and maintains the structural integrity of the skylight, ensuring safety without additional costs or complexity.

Implementation Method 1

the dynamic load in the event of a fall into the dome is absorbed by controlled deformation of the mounting frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

The fastening frame is designed to deform in a controlled manner upon impact, absorbing the dynamic forces generated by a fall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP1748120B2Skylight
Publication Date: 2013.02.13 LINHART WERNER
  • EP1748120B2 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1748120B2 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1748120B2 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The dome (1) has two shells (2, 2`) arranged one above the other, where edges of the shells are attached to an attachment collar (3). A net (7) is arranged between the shells, where the net is attached at the dome in a region between the shell edges. A frame that runs sectionally along the shell edges is embedded with retainers between the shell edges. The net exhibits a thick seam (8) at its circumference, where the seam lies undetachably in a gap between the shell edges.