Slatted Frame Stop Strip Design for Increased Spring Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing slatted frame designs suffer from reduced axial spring deflection and risk of damage when spring bodies tilt, due to the placement of stop surfaces within the spring travel path and the transmission of impulse loads to the longitudinal beam.

Innovation Solution

The stop surface is relocated from the assembly body to the longitudinal beam, where a stop strip limits deflection, allowing for increased axial travel and preventing damage by ensuring that stop plates on the beam side absorb tilting forces, with the option to adjust stop limits by exchanging stop bars of different heights.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the stop surface is placed on the assembly body to limit spring deflection, then the spring bodies are protected from excessive deflection, but the axial spring travel is severely limited and the movement space is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from excessive deflectionVSAvoidaxial spring travel
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The stop surface is relocated from the assembly body to the longitudinal beam, changing the spatial dimension where the stopping function is implemented. This dimensional shift allows the spring bodies to achieve greater axial travel while the stop strip on the longitudinal beam provides the necessary deflection limitation, resolving the contradiction between protection and movement space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the stop surface is placed on the assembly body to prevent tilting, then the spring bodies are protected from damage due to tilting, but the maximum spring deflection is reduced and the spring structure is damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from tilting damageVSAvoidmaximum spring deflection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The stopping function is moved to the longitudinal beam in a different spatial location, allowing the spring bodies to deflect further axially while the stop strip provides lateral stabilization. This resolves the contradiction between preventing tilting damage and maintaining maximum spring deflection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The stop strip acts as an intermediary element between the spring bodies and the longitudinal beam, providing both the stopping function to prevent excessive deflection and the stabilization to prevent tilting, without directly interfering with the spring bodies' axial movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If the damper strip is attached only to the upper side of the longitudinal beam to limit deflection, then the spring body deflection is controlled, but impulse loads are transmitted to the entire longitudinal beam causing potential damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeflection controlVSAvoidimpulse load transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The stop strip is designed with localized engagement features that interact with specific portions of the spring body structure rather than the entire longitudinal beam. This local quality approach allows deflection control while isolating impulse loads to specific areas, preventing transmission to the entire beam structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances axial spring deflection and prevents damage by eliminating internal stop limitations, allowing for greater freedom of movement and adjustable deflection limits, while maintaining a robust connection to withstand high loads.

Implementation Method 1

When the spring slats are loaded with the maximum compression pressure, the spring bodies are compressed in parallel, developing a counterforce

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring compression: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the limit stop for limiting the deflection of the spring body is formed from a stop strip fastened on the side of the longitudinal beam the underside of a stop plate can be brought to a stop

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical contact stop: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP3037020B1Slatted frame having a plurality of mounting bodies for holding slats
Publication Date: 2017.06.21 DOC
  • EP3037020B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3037020B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3037020B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Slatted frame (1), consisting of interconnected longitudinal (2) and transverse bars with a number of mounting bodies (12) which are fixed at a mutual distance on the inside of the respective longitudinal bar (2), with the respective mounting body (12) having the respective Ends of spring slats (33) are accommodated in insertion pockets (7, 8) which are arranged on the top of one or more spring bodies (4-6) which are connected to the respective assembly body (12), with a limit stop for limiting the deflection of the spring bodies (4-6), the stop limiter for limiting the deflection of the spring bodies (4-6) being formed from a stop bar (11) fastened to the longitudinal beam side, which can be brought to a stop on the underside of a stop plate (9,10). is, which is connected to the insertion pocket (7.8).