Slew Rate Control via Adjustable Voltage Rails

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Fast transitions in power converters cause electromagnetic interference (EMI) noise, leading to logic defects and excessive voltage ripple, which existing slew-rate controlled drivers attempt to mitigate through complex control algorithms and additional circuitry, resulting in area penalties and increased complexity.

Innovation Solution

A driver apparatus with multiple stages and adjustable rail-to-rail voltage modulators, utilizing upper and lower rail voltage modulators to control the slew rate by adjusting the voltage difference between VDD and VSS, allowing for proportional control of the switching element's slew rate through Vctrl+ and Vctrl- generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If fast transitions are used in power converters, then switching efficiency is improved, but electromagnetic interference noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitching efficiencyVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic slew rate control by adjusting the effective gate voltage through modulated supply rails (VDD and VSS). The control circuit dynamically modifies the voltage difference between supply rails based on switching phase, enabling fast transitions during critical phases while limiting slew rate during other phases to reduce EMI noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the electrical parameters of the driver circuit by modulating the supply voltage levels. Specifically, it varies the voltage difference between VDD and VSS to control the slew rate, allowing the system to switch between high-speed operation and low-noise operation by adjusting these voltage parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If slew rate is reduced to minimize noise, then electromagnetic interference decreases, but switching speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic interference noiseVSAvoidswitching speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic modulation to the supply rails VDD and VSS synchronized with the switching frequency. During specific periods of the switching cycle, the voltage difference is increased to enable fast transitions, while during other periods it is reduced to minimize EMI noise, creating a periodic pattern of high-speed and low-noise operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit dynamically adjusts the slew rate based on real-time switching requirements. By continuously modulating the supply voltage difference, the system can adaptively switch between fast switching mode and noise-reduction mode, optimizing both speed and EMI performance throughout the operating cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-generated harmful factors

If complex control algorithms are used to manage slew rate, then noise control improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise controlVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary control circuit that modulates the supply rails VDD and VSS instead of directly controlling the gate driver. This intermediary approach simplifies the control architecture by using voltage modulation as a mediator between the control logic and the switching element, reducing the complexity of direct slew rate control while maintaining effective noise management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The modulated supply rails serve multiple functions simultaneously: they provide power to the driver circuit, control the slew rate, and enable noise reduction. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate control circuits and algorithms, simplifying the overall device complexity while maintaining effective noise control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces high slew-rate induced noise by automatically adjusting the rail-to-rail voltage, simplifying control algorithms and reducing complexity, while maintaining efficient switching performance.

Implementation Method 1

the gate capacitance of a switching element such as a transistor is charged from a low voltage to a voltage beyond the threshold voltage. As known in the art, the voltage across a capacitor cannot change instantaneously.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentUS9236856B2Apparatus for controlling slew rate
Publication Date: 2016.01.12 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US9236856B2 patent drawing
  • US9236856B2 patent drawing
  • US9236856B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for controlling slew rate is coupled to two adjustable voltage rails. The output of the apparatus is coupled to the gate of a switching element. By employing two adjustable voltage rails, the slew rate of the switching element is proportional to the voltage difference between the first adjustable rail and the second adjustable rail. The slew rate control apparatus can be applied to a variety of switching elements including N channel Field Effect Transistors (NFETs), P channel Field Effect Transistors (PFETs), current mode logic circuits and level shifter circuits.